Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial augmented reality in smart manufacturing: a solution for manual working stations

Uva, Antonio E., Gattullo, Michele, Manghisi, Vito M., Spagnulo, Daniele, Cascella, Giuseppe L., Fiorentino, Michele·2018·The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
DOI 10.1007/s00170-017-0846-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00170-017-0846-4

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Ceruti A, Liverani A, Marzocca P (2015) A 3D User and Maintenance for UAVs and Commercial Aircraft based on Augmented Reality, SAE Technical Papers, vol.2015-September, no. September, 2015.
  2. Bordegoni M, Ferrise F, Carrabba E, Di Donato M, Fiorentino M, Uva AE (2014) An application based on augmented reality and mobile technology to support remote maintenance. In Conference and Exhibition of the European Association of Virtual and Augmented Reality. 1(1):131–135
  3. De Marchi L, Ceruti A, Testoni N, Marzani A, Liverani A (2014) Use of augmented reality in aircraft maintenance operations. In SPIE Smart Structures and Materials+ Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, pp. 906412–906412
  4. Wickens, CD, Hollands JG, Banbury S, Parasuraman R (2015) Engineering Psychology & Human Performance. Routledge New York, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Nee A, Ong S, Chryssolouris G, Mourtzis D (2012) Augmented reality applications in design and manufacturing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(2):657–679 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Van Krevelen D, Poelman R (2010) A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications and limitations. Int J Virtual Reality 9(2):1 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Fiorentino M, Uva AE, Gattullo M, Debernardis S, Monno G (2014) Augmented reality on large screen for interactive maintenance instructions. Comput Ind 65(2):270–278 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Kruijff E, Swan JE, Feiner S (2010) Perceptual issues in augmented reality revisited. In Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2010 9th IEEE International Symposium on, pp. 3–12 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bimber O, Raskar R (2005) Spatial augmented reality: merging real and virtual worlds. CRC press New York, 2005 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Di Donato M, Fiorentino M, Uva AE, Gattullo M, Monno G (2015) Text legibility for projected augmented reality on industrial workbenches. Comput Ind 70:70–78 · DOI
  11. Uva AE, Fiorentino M, Gattullo M, Colaprico M, Ruvo MF, Marino F, Trotta GF, Manghisi VM, Boccaccio A, Bevilacqua V, Monno G (2016) Design of a projective AR workbench for manual working stations, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 9768, pp. 358–367, 2016.
  12. Wang X, Ong SK, Nee AYC (Mar. 2016) A comprehensive survey of augmented reality assembly research. Advances in Manufacturing 4(1):1 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Tang A, Owen C, Biocca F, Mou W (2003) Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly, in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 2003, pp. 73–80.
  14. Tegeltija S, Lazarevic M, Stankovski S, Cosic I, Todorovic V, Ostojic G (2016) Heating circulation pump disassembly process improved with augmented reality. Therm Sci 20(suppl. 2):611–622 · DOI
  15. Elia V, Gnoni MG, Lanzilotto A (2016) Evaluating the application of augmented reality devices in manufacturing from a process point of view: an AHP based model. Expert Syst Appl 63:187–197 · DOI
  16. Doshi A, Smith RT, Thomas BH, Bouras C (2016) Use of projector based augmented reality to improve manual spot-welding precision and accuracy for automotive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:1279–1293 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kantowitz BH (1987) 3. Mental workload, in Advances in Psychology, vol. 47, P. A. Hancock, Ed. North-Holland, pp. 81–121
  18. Kim S, Dey AK (2009) Simulated augmented reality windshield display as a cognitive mapping aid for elder driver navigation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 133–142 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Olwal A, Gustafsson J, Lindfors C (2008) Spatial augmented reality on industrial CNC-machines, in The engineering reality of virtual reality 2008 · DOI
  20. Andersen RS, Madsen O, Moeslund TB, Amor HB (2016) Projecting robot intentions into human environments. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on, pp. 294–301 · DOI

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Uva, A. E., Gattullo, M., Manghisi, V. M., Spagnulo, D., Cascella, G. L., & Fiorentino, M.
Venue
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-08-12
Volume
94
Issue
1-4
Pages
509-521
ISSN
  • 0268-3768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3015
DOI
10.1007/s00170-017-0846-4
OpenAlex
W2742431581
Cited by
239
References
0
FWCI
8.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial augmented reality in smart manufacturing: a solution for manual working stations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00170-017-0846-4
The paper
Uva, A. E., Gattullo, M., Manghisi, V. M., Spagnulo, D., Cascella, G. L., & Fiorentino, M. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial augmented reality in smart manufacturing: a solution for manual working stations. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0846-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.