The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
3D Printing in Zero G Technology Demonstration Mission: complete experimental results and summary of related material modeling efforts
Open accessAbstract
In 2014, NASA, in partnership with Made In Space, Inc., launched the first 3D printer to the International Space Station. Results of the first phase of operations for this mission demonstrated use of the fused filament fabrication (FFF) process for 3D printing in a microgravity environment. Previously published results indicated differences in density and mechanical properties of specimens printed in microgravity and those manufactured with the printer prior to its launch to ISS. Based on extensive analyses, these differences were hypothesized to be a result of subtle changes in manufacturing process settings rather than a microgravity influence on the FFF process. Phase II operations provided an opportunity to produce additional specimens in microgravity, evaluate the impact of changes in the extruder standoff distance, and ultimate provide a more rigorous assessment of microgravity effects through control of manufacturing process settings. Based on phase II results and a holistic consideration of phase I and phase II flight specimens, no engineering-significant microgravity effects on the process are noted. Results of accompanying material modeling efforts, which simulate the FFF process under a variety of conditions (including microgravity), are also presented. No significant microgravity effects on material outcomes are noted in the physics-based model of the FFF process. The 3D printing in zero G technology demonstration mission represents the first instance of off-world manufacturing. It represents the first step toward transforming logistics for long duration space exploration and is also an important crew safety enhancement for extended space missions where cargo resupply is not readily available. This paper presents the holistic results of phase I and II on-orbit operations and also includes material modeling efforts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It has been proven that microgravity has a minimal impact on DIW prints [245,246].”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [245]
In the citing paper
“Although direct tests on planets are lacking at present, comparisons between the printed objects in space station and Earth demonstrate that there were no engineering-significant differences between samples fabricated in microgravity and normal gravity, whereas microgravity still promotes slightly better tensile”
From Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review (2024) · cites this paper as [66]
In the citing paper
“whereas microgravity still promotes slightly better tensile but worse compressive and flexural characteristics. 66,67”
From Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review (2024) · cites this paper as [66]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 173
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Prater T, Quincy B, Werkheiser N, and Ledbetter F (2016) NASA’s In-Space Manufacturing initiative: initial results from International Space Station Technology Demonstration and Future Plans. Proceedings of National Space and Missile Materials Symposium, Westminster Colorado
- ASTM D638-14 (2014) Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
- ASTM D695-15 (2015) Standard test methods for compressive properties of rigid plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
- Rahman M, Schott N.R., and Kanta Sadhu L Glass Transition of ABS in 3D Printing. Excerpt from the Proceedings of the 2016 COMSOL Conference. Boston, MA. http://www.comsol.com/paper/download/361301/rahman_paper.pdf
- Guthrie P (2016) ‘Sporks in Space’: Bothell firm brings recycling to final frontier. Herald Business Journal, www.heraldnet.com/business/sporks-in-space-bothell-firm-brings-recycling-to-final-frontier/
- Snyder R (2017) Reversible thermoset materials for in situ resource utilization. Proc. 2017 National Space and Missile Materials Symposium, Indian Wells, CA
- Prater T, Werkheiser N, and Ledbetter F (2017) Toward a multimaterial fabrication laboratory: In-Space Manufacturing as an enabling capability for long endurance human space flight. Proceedings of the AIAA Space and Astronautics Forum 2017, Orlando, FL
Metadata
- Authors
- Prater, T., Werkheiser, N., Ledbetter, F., Timucin, D., Wheeler, K., & Snyder, M.
- Affiliations
- Marshall Space Flight Center (US)
- Ames Research Center (US)
- Made In Space (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Prater, Tracie
- Venue
- The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
- Published
- 2018-11-03
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 391-417
- ISSN
- 0268-3768 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-3015
- PMC
- PMC7243176
- OpenAlex
- W2898863411
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
- Keywords
- fused deposition modeling, International Space Station, process parameter control, material properties, density, additive manufacturing in space
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review