Cited by 173Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesInnovations in Concrete and Construction MaterialsAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

3D Printing in Zero G Technology Demonstration Mission: complete experimental results and summary of related material modeling efforts

Open access
Prater, Tracie, Werkheiser, Niki, Ledbetter, Frank, Timucin, Dogan, Wheeler, Kevin, Snyder, Mike·2019·The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Abstract

In 2014, NASA, in partnership with Made In Space, Inc., launched the first 3D printer to the International Space Station. Results of the first phase of operations for this mission demonstrated use of the fused filament fabrication (FFF) process for 3D printing in a microgravity environment. Previously published results indicated differences in density and mechanical properties of specimens printed in microgravity and those manufactured with the printer prior to its launch to ISS. Based on extensive analyses, these differences were hypothesized to be a result of subtle changes in manufacturing process settings rather than a microgravity influence on the FFF process. Phase II operations provided an opportunity to produce additional specimens in microgravity, evaluate the impact of changes in the extruder standoff distance, and ultimate provide a more rigorous assessment of microgravity effects through control of manufacturing process settings. Based on phase II results and a holistic consideration of phase I and phase II flight specimens, no engineering-significant microgravity effects on the process are noted. Results of accompanying material modeling efforts, which simulate the FFF process under a variety of conditions (including microgravity), are also presented. No significant microgravity effects on material outcomes are noted in the physics-based model of the FFF process. The 3D printing in zero G technology demonstration mission represents the first instance of off-world manufacturing. It represents the first step toward transforming logistics for long duration space exploration and is also an important crew safety enhancement for extended space missions where cargo resupply is not readily available. This paper presents the holistic results of phase I and II on-orbit operations and also includes material modeling efforts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00170-018-2827-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 173

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Prater T, Quincy B, Werkheiser N, and Ledbetter F (2016) NASA’s In-Space Manufacturing initiative: initial results from International Space Station Technology Demonstration and Future Plans. Proceedings of National Space and Missile Materials Symposium, Westminster Colorado
  2. ASTM D638-14 (2014) Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
  3. ASTM D695-15 (2015) Standard test methods for compressive properties of rigid plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
  4. Rahman M, Schott N.R., and Kanta Sadhu L Glass Transition of ABS in 3D Printing. Excerpt from the Proceedings of the 2016 COMSOL Conference. Boston, MA. http://www.comsol.com/paper/download/361301/rahman_paper.pdf
  5. Guthrie P (2016) ‘Sporks in Space’: Bothell firm brings recycling to final frontier. Herald Business Journal, www.heraldnet.com/business/sporks-in-space-bothell-firm-brings-recycling-to-final-frontier/
  6. Snyder R (2017) Reversible thermoset materials for in situ resource utilization. Proc. 2017 National Space and Missile Materials Symposium, Indian Wells, CA
  7. Prater T, Werkheiser N, and Ledbetter F (2017) Toward a multimaterial fabrication laboratory: In-Space Manufacturing as an enabling capability for long endurance human space flight. Proceedings of the AIAA Space and Astronautics Forum 2017, Orlando, FL

Metadata

Authors
Prater, T., Werkheiser, N., Ledbetter, F., Timucin, D., Wheeler, K., & Snyder, M.
Affiliations
  • Marshall Space Flight Center (US)
  • Ames Research Center (US)
  • Made In Space (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Prater, Tracie
Venue
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Published
2018-11-03
Volume
101
Issue
1-4
Pages
391-417
ISSN
  • 0268-3768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3015
OpenAlex
W2898863411
Cited by
173
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Keywords
fused deposition modeling, International Space Station, process parameter control, material properties, density, additive manufacturing in space

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review