Cited by 298Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 156 of the 159 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent advances in surface defect inspection of industrial products using deep learning techniques

Zheng, Xiaoqing, Zheng, Song, Kong, Yaguang, Chen, Jie·2021·The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00170-021-06592-8

Cites

156 of 156 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 159 references

3 of the 159 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Steger C, Ulrich M, Wiedemann C (2018) Machine vision algorithms and applications: second completely revised and Enlarged Edition. Wiley-VCH, Hoboken
  2. Mahajan PM, Kolhe SR, Patil PM (2009) A review of automatic fabric defect detection techniques. Adv Comput Res 1(2):18–29
  3. Tang B, Kong J, Wu S (2017) Review of surface defect detection based on machine vision. J Chin Image Graph 22(12):1640–1663. https://doi.org/10.11834/jig.160623 · DOI
  4. Gao XD, Gao B, He Z, Xin WH (2006) Fabric defect detection based on support vector machine. J Text Res 27(5):26–28
  5. Tseng DC, Chung IL, Tsai PL, Chou CM (2011) Defect classification for Lcd color filters using neural-network decision tree classifier. Int J Innov Comput I 7(7a):3695–3707
  6. Goodfellow IJ, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y (2014) Generative adversarial nets. Adv Neural Inf Proces Syst 27(nips 2014):27
  7. Akcay S, Atapour-Abarghouei A, Breckon TP (2019) GANomaly: semi-supervised anomaly detection via adversarial training. Computer vision - Accv 2018, Pt Iii 11363:622–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20893-6_39 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–298 of 298

Metadata

Authors
Zheng, X., Zheng, S., Kong, Y., & Chen, J.
Affiliations
Hangzhou Dianzi University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zheng, Xiaoqing
Venue
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Published
2021-01-25
Volume
113
Issue
1-2
Pages
35-58
ISSN
  • 0268-3768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3015
OpenAlex
W3124804470
Cited by
287
References
159
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 4
FWCI
18.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1609212)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
surface defect detection, automated visual inspection, machine vision, deep learning, industrial inspection, semiconductor manufacturing, steel industry, textile industry, defect detection algorithm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review