The DOI matches its Crossref record; 325 of the 326 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of design and fabrication strategies for thermoplastic lightweight thin-walled stiffened shells and lattice structures utilizing fused-filament fabrication (FFF)
Open accessAbstract
The demand for lightweight and mechanically reliable structures has motivated increased interest in Additive Manufacturing (AM), particularly Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), while underscoring the importance of an integrated understanding of the design-to-fabrication workflow. While numerous studies have focused on individual aspects of the FFF process in fabrication of such structures, detailed review linking design strategies, optimization techniques, and manufacturing challenges are scarce. This work addresses that gap by reviewing current strategies for designing and fabricating lightweight structures using FFF. First, it investigates sophisticated design and optimization strategies, consisting of Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) concepts and Topology Optimization (TO) techniques specifically adapted for thin-walled and lattice structures. The limitations of traditional CAD tools are extensively investigated along with a summary of major manufacturing challenges. The review combines multidisciplinary insights to create an integrated understanding for generating structurally efficient and reliable FFF components. It concludes by outlining prospective future research avenues, including artificial intelligence–driven process control and digital twins for predictive modeling. This work offers a detailed resource for researchers and practitioners aiming to address existing limitations and drive FFF towards resilient next-generation lightweight systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges
Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., & Hui, D. (2018) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 · Cited by 8,431
The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering
Gao, W., Zhang, Y., Ramanujan, D., Ramani, K., Chen, Y., Williams, C. B., Wang, C. C. L., Shin, Y. C., Zhang, S., & Zavattieri, P. D. (2015) · Computer-Aided Design · doi:10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001 · Cited by 2,657
Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS
Ahn, S., Montero, M., Odell, D., Roundy, S., & Wright, P. K. (2002) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/13552540210441166 · Cited by 2,396
Design for Additive Manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints
Thompson, M. K., Moroni, G., Vaneker, T., Fadel, G., Campbell, R. I., Gibson, I., Bernard, A., Schulz, J., Graf, P., Ahuja, B., et al. (2016) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004 · Cited by 2,025
Evaluation of 3D Printing and Its Potential Impact on Biotechnology and the Chemical Sciences
Gross, B. C., Erkal, J. L., Lockwood, S. Y., Chen, C., & Spence, D. M. (2014) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac403397r · Cited by 1,746
Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts
Sood, A. K., Ohdar, R., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2009) · Materials & Design (1980-2015) · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 · Cited by 1,380
A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites
Parandoush, P., & Lin, D. L. (2017) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088 · Cited by 1,275
Genetic algorithms for modelling and optimisation
McCall, J. (2005) · Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1016/j.cam.2004.07.034 · Cited by 1,013
Level-set methods for structural topology optimization: a review
van Dijk, N. P., Maute, K. K., Langelaar, M., & van Keulen, F. (2013) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-013-0912-y · Cited by 1,012
A review of topology optimization for additive manufacturing: Status and challenges
Zhu, J., Zhou, H., Wang, C., Lü, Z., Yuan, S., & Zhang, W. (2020) · Chinese Journal of Aeronautics · doi:10.1016/j.cja.2020.09.020 · Cited by 904
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- R. Ahmed, R. S. Niloy, M. R. Mozumder, and T. A. Shanto, “Application of Fused Filament Fabrication in Marine Sector, From Rapid Prototyping to Final Product,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Marine Technology (MARTEC 2024), Sep. 2024, pp. 57–63. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388682275_APPLICATION_OF_FUSED_FILAMENT_FABRICATION_IN_MARINE_SECTOR_FROM_RAPID_PROTOTYPING_TO_FINAL_PRODUCT
- M. J. Zulqernine, Md. A. Alam, M. R. Uddin, I. S. Dola, and T. A. Shanto, “An Investigation on the Applications of Additive Manufacturing in the Marine Industry,” in Proceedings of MARTEC 2024: The International Conference on Marine Technology, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia, Sep. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388830803_AN_INVESTIGATION_ON_THE_APPLICATIONS_OF_ADDITIVE_MANUFACTURING_IN_THE_MARINE_INDUSTRY
- H. Pandit, K. Rajwardhan Pandit, and H. Chandrakant Pandit, “Advances in Jig Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Technologies, and Applications,” Harshwardhan Chandrakant Pandit. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com, vol. 13, 2023.
- Srivastava P, Arumugam AB, Agrawal AP, Ntumba ZN (2025) Development of hemp fiber reinforced PLA composites for sustainable 3D printing: mechanical and microstructural properties. J Nat Fibers. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2025.2558214 · DOI
- S. Allen and D. Dutta, “On the computation of part orientation using support structures in layered manufacturing.,” Proceedings of the Solid Free-form Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, 1994.
- S. N. H. Mazlan, A. Zuhra, A. Kadir, and Y. Yusof, “Overhang Analysis Fabricated Using Fused Deposition Modeling Technique,” Journal of Advanced Industrial Technology and Application, vol. 1, no. 1, 2020.
- D. Stan, A. Tulcan, L. Tulcan, and T. Iclanzan, “Influence factors on the dimensional accuracy of the plastic parts,” Materiale Plastice, vol. 45, no. 1, 2008.
- D. A. Wittahachchi, “Reducing Design Iteration Cycles in Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) of Components for Hydrofoils & Drones,” Master’s Thesis, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland, 2025.
- P. Kumar and E. Fernández, “Topology optimization for additive manufacturing with length scale, overhang, and building orientation constraints,” Apr. 2022, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.07333 · arXiv
- D. Jiang and D. E. Smith, “Topology Optimization for 3D Material Distribution and Orientation in Additive Manufacturing,” in Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin, 2017, pp. 2236–2249.
- N. Hertlein and J. Kubalak, “Generative Adversarial Networks for Topology Optimization with Orientation,” in Solid Freeform Fabrication 2025: Proceedings of the 36th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium – An Additive Manufacturing Conference, Austin, TX, USA, 2025.
- R. Hoglund and D. E. Smith, “Continuous fiber angle topology optimization for polymer fused filament fabrication,” in Solid Freeform Fabrication 2016: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium - An Additive Manufacturing Conference, SFF 2016, 2016.
- Mortenson ME (2006) Geometric modeling ,. Industrial Press, New York
- A. H. M. Haidiezul, M. S. Dolah, M. Khalid, N. A. Shuaib, N. A. Omar, and A. Mahmud, “EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF SANDBLASTING AND SPRAY COATING ON SURFACE THICKNESS IN ABS 3D PRINTED PARTS,” Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 18, no. 2, 2024.
- S. N. R. Kantareddy, B. M. Roh, T. W. Simpson, S. Joshi, C. Dickman, and E. A. Lehtihet, “Saving weight with metallic lattice structures: Design challenges with a real-world example,” in Solid Freeform Fabrication 2016: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium - An Additive Manufacturing Conference, SFF 2016, 2016.
- T. A. Shanto, H. R. Pavel, R. Ahmed, M. Abdullah, and R. M. Taylor, “Leveraging large language models for process parameter optimization in 3D-printed ABS polymer specimens,” in IISE Annual Conference. Proceedings, 2025, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.21872/2025IISE_6901. · DOI
- T. A. Shanto, M. A. Shahriar, T. Ahmed, M. J. Zulqernine, and R. M. Taylor, “Predicting mechanical strength in FDM printed ABS parts with in-process annealing: A machine learning approach,” in IISE Annual Conference. Proceedings, 2025, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.21872/2025IISE_6734. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mohammed, D. F. (2026) · Al-Noor Journal of Engineering Management and Computer Science · doi:10.71229/wx7czg04
Munshi, M. R., Haque, M. M., & Zaman, P. B. (2026) · Next Materials · doi:10.1016/j.nxmate.2026.102862
A review of carbon composite marine propellers
Niloy, R. S., & Prusty, B. G. (2026) · Composites Part B Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2026.114138
Material–topology interaction in the tensile behaviour of FDM-printed PLA and TPU lattices
Tzu-Hua, C., Kai-Ting, C., & Li, Y.-T. (2026) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-026-19102-5
Kim, S., Cho, K., Vu, T. H., Lee, S., & Park, S. J. (2026) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma19194067
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmed, R., Dola, I. S., Ahmed, S., Rahman, M. M., Shanto, T. A., & Taylor, R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, Robert
- Venue
- The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
- Published
- 2026-05-09
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- 6111-6158
- ISSN
- 0268-3768 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-3015
- OpenAlex
- W7160706711
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 326
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6
- FWCI
- 10.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Cellular and Composite Structures
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
- Keywords
- fused deposition modeling, lightweight structures, thin-walled structures, stiffened shells, lattice structures, design for additive manufacturing, topology optimization, production problems, digital twin, predictive modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
