The AUSGeoid98 geoid model of Australia: data treatment, computations and comparisons with GPS-levelling data
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Systematic differences exist between AUSGeoid98 and GPS-AHD data, and also between AUSGeoid98 and global geoid models.
“We have repeatedly shown that there are systematic differences between the current Australian geoid model, AUSGeoid98 (Featherstone et al., 2001), and GPS-AHD data (e.g., Featherstone and Guo, 2001;Featherstone, 2004), as well as with global geoid models (e.g., Featherstone and Stewart, 1998).”
From Height systems and vertical datums: A review in the Australian context (2006) · cites this paper as Featherstone et al., 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008)
Pavlis, N. K., Holmes, S. A., Kenyon, S. C., & Factor, J. K. (2012) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2011jb008916 · Cited by 2,641 · see citing works
Height systems and vertical datums: A review in the Australian context
Featherstone, W. E., & Kuhn, M. (2006) · Journal of Spatial Science · doi:10.1080/14498596.2006.9635062 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Featherstone, W. E., Kirby, J. F., Kearsley, A. H. W., Gilliland, J. R., Johnston, G. M., Steed, J., Forsberg, R., & Sideris, M. G.
- Affiliations
- Curtin University (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Danish Geodata Agency (DK)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Venue
- Journal of Geodesy
- Published
- 2001-08-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 313-330
- ISSN
- 0949-7714 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1394
- OpenAlex
- W1998406198
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 8.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Geodesy (publishedVersion)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Cartography
- Keywords
- geoid height, EGM96, satellite altimetry, marine gravity anomalies, digital elevation model, fast Fourier transform, Australian Height Datum, GPS leveling, geoid accuracy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
