Cited by 8Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsGynecological conditions and treatments

Hysterectomy with uterosacral suspension or UpholdTM hysteropexy in women with apical prolapse: a parallel cohort study

Kulkarni, Mugdha, Young, Natharnia, Lee, Joseph, Rosamilia, Anna·2020·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis The aim was to compare objective and subjective cure rates between Uphold™ hysteropexy (HP) and vaginal hysterectomy (VH) with uterosacral suspension. Methods A sample size of 49 in each arm would be required to detect a clinical difference of 20% between the groups. Owing to delayed recruitment, this originally planned randomised controlled trial was changed to a patient preference study after randomising initial 6 participants. Women with symptomatic stage ≥2 uterine descent wishing a surgical solution were included. Routine follow-up was scheduled at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter. Primary outcome was absence of stage ≥2 apical prolapse. Secondary outcomes included a composite cure of no leading edge beyond the hymen, absence of bulge symptoms and no retreatment; patient-reported outcomes were based on quality-of-life questionnaires (PFDI-20, PFIQ-7, PISQ-12, PGI-I, EQ5D and a health score). Results We recruited 50 patients undergoing VH between 2011 and 2013 and 51 patients undergoing HP between 2011 and 2016. Participants were followed up for a median of 25 months (23-96). Five women from the VH (10%) and 7 from the HP (14%) group were lost to follow-up. Combined anatomical and symptomatic outcomes were available for 41 (82%) VH and 39 (76%) in the HP group. There was no difference in objective apical outcomes; the incidence of stage 2 prolapse was 0% in the VH group and 2% in HP group (p = 0.50). We found no difference in the composite cure rate (78% VH vs 85% HP, 0.45) between the groups. There was no significant difference in surgical complications (p = 0.33), assessed using Clavien-Dindo classification. There was a 2% surgery rate for mesh exposure in the HP group. Conclusions Uphold™ uterine suspension and VH appear to have similar objective and subjective cure at 25 months, with no significant difference in surgical complications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-020-04328-y

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Randomized controlled trials for this topic have ethical quandaries and external validity issues because participants must relinquish autonomy of a reproductive organ to randomization, which limits their utility and appropriateness.

    “Though randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exist, 19,25 ethical quandaries and external validity issues given that participants must relinquish autonomy of a reproductive organ to randomization places limits on utility and appropriateness of RCT evidence for this topic.31,32”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kulkarni, M., Young, N., Lee, J., & Rosamilia, A.
Affiliations
  • Monash Health (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Kulkarni, Mugdha
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2020-05-28
Volume
31
Issue
10
Pages
2137-2146
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W3029385280
Cited by
8
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
vaginal hysterectomy, cure rate, patient-reported outcomes, quality of life, surgical complications, mesh exposure, patient preferences
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Hysterectomy, Vaginal, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Uterine Prolapse, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review