Factors involved in prolapse recurrence one year after anterior vaginal repair
Open accessAbstract
Introduction and hypothesis The aim of this study was to identify which factors are associated with anatomic and symptomatic prolapse recurrence in the anterior compartment 1 year after traditional anterior vaginal repair. Our study hypothesis was that major defects in pelvic floor support structures before surgery are associated with higher recurrence rates. Methods This was a prospective multicenter study including women with symptomatic anterior compartment prolapse who underwent primary vaginal surgery. Prolapse examination was performed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system, prolapse symptoms were described using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form (PFDI-20), and levator ani avulsion and hiatal area were identified by translabial 3D ultrasonography. Results During the inclusion period, 455 patients were recruited and 442 (97.1%) attended the 1-year follow-up. In three cases, ultrasound data were not available, and the remaining 439 formed the study group. Anatomic and symptomatic recurrence rates were 45.1% and 6.8%, respectively. Levator avulsion increased the risk of anatomic (OR: 1.96) and symptomatic (OR: 2.60) recurrence; abnormal distensibility of the levator hiatal area increased the risk of anatomic (OR: 2.51) and symptomatic (OR: 2.43) recurrence; advanced prolapse increased the risk of anatomic recurrence: POP-Q stage 3 (OR: 2.34) and POP-Q stage 4 (OR: 5.47). Conclusions Major defects in pelvic floor support structures before surgery are associated with higher recurrence rates 1 year after native tissue vaginal repair. Advanced stage of prolapse increases the risk of anatomic recurrence, while levator avulsion and abnormal distensibility of the levator hiatus area increase the risk of both anatomic and symptomatic recurrence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
POP-Q stage in relation to subjective recurrence has not yet been reported by other studies.
“POP-Q stage in relation to subjective recurrence has not yet been reported by other studies.”
From Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
In the past few years, some studies have described the effect of family history and levator defect on POP recurrence.
“In the past few years, some studies have described the effect of family history and levator defect on POP recurrence.14,20,22”
From Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review
Vergeldt, T. F. M., Weemhoff, M., IntHout, J., & Kluivers, K. B. (2015) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-015-2695-8 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse
Maher, C., Feiner, B., Baessler, K., Christmann-Schmid, C., Haya, N., & Brown, J. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004014.pub6 · Cited by 266 · cited 3× · see citing works
“repair was performed [5], and in the study of Rodrigo et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRisk factors for prolapse recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis
Friedman, T., Eslick, G. D., & Dietz, H. P. (2018) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-017-3475-4 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Levator hiatal area as a risk factor for cystocele recurrence after surgery: a prospective study
Vergeldt, T., Notten, K., Weemhoff, M., van Kuijk, S., Mulder, F., Beets‐Tan, R., Vliegen, R., Gondrie, E., Bergmans, M., Roovers, J., et al. (2015) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13340 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schulten, S. F., Detollenaere, R. J., IntHout, J., Kluivers, K. B., & Van Eijndhoven, H. W. (2022) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.017 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Diez-Itza, I., Avila, M., Uranga, S., Belar, M., Lekuona, A., & Martin, A.
- Affiliations
- Donostiako Unibertsitate Ospitalea (ES)
- University of the Basque Country (ES)
- ORCID
- Diez-Itza, Irene
- Venue
- International Urogynecology Journal
- Published
- 2020-08-05
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2027-2034
- ISSN
- 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-3023
- OpenAlex
- W3047103838
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Communities in ADDI (University of the Basque Country) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Hispana (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
- Keywords
- pelvic organ prolapse, prolapse recurrence, levator ani avulsion, POP-Q staging, pelvic floor support, pelvic floor distress
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Prospective Studies, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Ultrasonography, Vagina, Pelvic Floor, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review