How we do an anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse
Abstract
Since 2019, all vaginal mesh implants were removed from the market. Since, surgeons have only the autologous technique left to treat prolapse by vaginal route. The anterior sacrospinofixation is an alternative technique to treat vaginally apical prolapses. We have divided the anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation technique into 10 surgical steps: exposure, infiltration, vaginal incision, vesico-vaginal dissection, paravesical dissection, sacrospinous ligament suture (two passage in the SSL on each side, using a suture-capturing device), vaginal fixation, vaginal closure, sacrospinous ligament fixation and final closure. We have performed more than 50 ASSF. This technique is not very well known, and the surgeons are more used to approach the SSL by posterior way. We have included a video of the procedure and an anatomical drawing exhibiting the dissection of the SSL without eyes control. We also added tips and tricks to easily apprehend this new technique. The anterior approach seems to has several advantages compared to the traditional posterior technique. We want to share such a video on showing how to approach the paravesical fossa anteriorly without eyes control.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Variations in repair techniques for the anterior and posterior compartments may further influence these results.
“Moreover, variations in the repair techniques for the anterior and posterior compartments may further influence these results [34–37”
From The uterus debate in vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: Hysteropexy versus hysterectomy – A systematic review and meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [35]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ruffolo, A. F., Salvatore, S., Torella, M., Frigerio, M., Soligo, M., Rubod, C., Lallemant, M., Cosson, M., Serati, M., & Braga, A. (2025) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108755 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationRuffolo, A. F., Lallemant, M., Barrieux, A., Rubod, C., & Cosson, M. (2025) · Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction · doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.102975 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Declas, E., Giraudet, G., De Graer, C., Bengler, C., Delplanque, S., & Cosson, M.
- Affiliations
- Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
- Université de Lille (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Declas, Estelle
- Venue
- International Urogynecology Journal
- Published
- 2021-06-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3305-3308
- ISSN
- 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-3023
- OpenAlex
- W3164483774
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Ureteral procedures and complications
- Keywords
- sacrospinous ligament, vaginal vault prolapse, apical pelvic organ prolapse, vaginal approach, surgical technique
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Ligaments, Ligaments, Articular, Pregnancy, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Vagina, Treatment Outcome, Colpotomy, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review