Prolapse and mesh reoperations following sacrocolpopexy: comparing supracervical hysterectomy, total hysterectomy, and no hysterectomy
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis Sacrocolpopexy is effective for apical prolapse repair and is often performed with hysterectomy. It is unknown whether supracervical or total hysterectomy at time of sacrocolpopexy influences prolapse recurrence and mesh complications. The primary objective of this study is to compare reoperations for recurrent prolapse after sacrocolpopexy with either supracervical hysterectomy or total hysterectomy, or without concomitant hysterectomy. We also sought to compare these three groups for the incidence of mesh complications and describe cervical interventions following supracervical hysterectomy. Methods A retrospective cohort study of sacrocolpopexy was performed using the MarketScan® Research Database. Women > 18 years who underwent sacrocolpopexy between 2010 to 2014 were identified. Utilizing diagnostic and procedural codes, reoperations for prolapse and mesh complications were identified. Women with < 2 years of follow-up were excluded. Results From 2010 to 2014, 3463 women underwent sacrocolpopexy with at least 2 years of follow-up, 910 (26.3%) with supracervical hysterectomy, 1243 (35.9%) with total hysterectomy, and 1310 (37.8%) without hysterectomy. Reoperations for prolapse were similar after supracervical hysterectomy (1.5%), after total hysterectomy (1.1%, p = 0.40), and without hysterectomy (1.5%, p = 0.98). Mesh complications after sacrocolpopexy were similar after supracervical hysterectomy (1.8%), after total hysterectomy (1.5%, p = 0.68), and without hysterectomy (2.8%, p = 0.11). Following supracervical hysterectomy, 0.9% underwent cervical procedures. Conclusions When comparing supracervical and total hysterectomy at time of sacrocolpopexy, there were no significant differences in reoperations for recurrent prolapse, reoperations for mesh complications, or mesh complication diagnoses. This study shows that surgeons can be reassured on performing hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
During 2 years of follow-up, the repeat surgery rates for prolapse were 1.5% with SCH, 1.1% with total hysterectomy, 1.5% with no hysterectomy, and 3.8% with SHP.
“During 2 years of follow‐up, the repeat surgery rates were 1.5% with SCH, 1.1% with total hysterectomy, 1.5% with no hysterectomy, and 3.8% with SHP [20].”
From Composite Failure Associated With Sacrohysteropexy and Sacrocolpopexy With Supracervical Hysterectomy for Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Kikuchi, J. Y., Yanek, L. R., Handa, V. L., Chen, C. C. G., Jacobs, S., Blomquist, J., & Patterson, D.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Greater Baltimore Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kikuchi, Jacqueline Y.
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Urogynecology Journal
- Published
- 2022-06-11
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 135-145
- ISSN
- 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-3023
- OpenAlex
- W4282939571
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
- Keywords
- sacrocolpopexy, subtotal hysterectomy, total hysterectomy, apical pelvic organ prolapse, prolapse recurrence, mesh complications, concomitant hysterectomy
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Laparoscopy, Postoperative Complications, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Surgical Mesh, Vagina, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review