Cited by 21Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsHernia repair and management

Prolapse and mesh reoperations following sacrocolpopexy: comparing supracervical hysterectomy, total hysterectomy, and no hysterectomy

Kikuchi, Jacqueline Y., Yanek, Lisa R., Handa, Victoria L., Chen, Chi Chiung Grace, Jacobs, Stephanie, Blomquist, Joan, Patterson, Danielle·2023·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis Sacrocolpopexy is effective for apical prolapse repair and is often performed with hysterectomy. It is unknown whether supracervical or total hysterectomy at time of sacrocolpopexy influences prolapse recurrence and mesh complications. The primary objective of this study is to compare reoperations for recurrent prolapse after sacrocolpopexy with either supracervical hysterectomy or total hysterectomy, or without concomitant hysterectomy. We also sought to compare these three groups for the incidence of mesh complications and describe cervical interventions following supracervical hysterectomy. Methods A retrospective cohort study of sacrocolpopexy was performed using the MarketScan® Research Database. Women > 18 years who underwent sacrocolpopexy between 2010 to 2014 were identified. Utilizing diagnostic and procedural codes, reoperations for prolapse and mesh complications were identified. Women with < 2 years of follow-up were excluded. Results From 2010 to 2014, 3463 women underwent sacrocolpopexy with at least 2 years of follow-up, 910 (26.3%) with supracervical hysterectomy, 1243 (35.9%) with total hysterectomy, and 1310 (37.8%) without hysterectomy. Reoperations for prolapse were similar after supracervical hysterectomy (1.5%), after total hysterectomy (1.1%, p = 0.40), and without hysterectomy (1.5%, p = 0.98). Mesh complications after sacrocolpopexy were similar after supracervical hysterectomy (1.8%), after total hysterectomy (1.5%, p = 0.68), and without hysterectomy (2.8%, p = 0.11). Following supracervical hysterectomy, 0.9% underwent cervical procedures. Conclusions When comparing supracervical and total hysterectomy at time of sacrocolpopexy, there were no significant differences in reoperations for recurrent prolapse, reoperations for mesh complications, or mesh complication diagnoses. This study shows that surgeons can be reassured on performing hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-022-05263-w

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 21

Authors
Kikuchi, J. Y., Yanek, L. R., Handa, V. L., Chen, C. C. G., Jacobs, S., Blomquist, J., & Patterson, D.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Greater Baltimore Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kikuchi, Jacqueline Y.
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2022-06-11
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
135-145
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W4282939571
Cited by
21
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
Keywords
sacrocolpopexy, subtotal hysterectomy, total hysterectomy, apical pelvic organ prolapse, prolapse recurrence, mesh complications, concomitant hysterectomy
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Laparoscopy, Postoperative Complications, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Surgical Mesh, Vagina, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review