Cited by 20Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsGynecological conditions and treatmentsUterine Myomas and Treatments

The anatomy of the sacrospinous ligament: how to avoid complications related to the sacrospinous fixation procedure for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Giraudet, Géraldine, Ruffolo, Alessandro Ferdinando, Lallemant, Marine, Cosson, Michel·2023·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis Historically, the sacrospinous ligament (SSL) has been used to treat POP in order to restore the apical compartment through a posterior or an anterior vaginal approach. The SSL is located in a complex anatomical region, rich in neurovascular structures that must be avoided to reduce complications such as acute hemorrhage or chronic pelvic pain. The aim of this three-dimensional (3D) video describing the SSL anatomy is to show the anatomical concerns related to the dissection and the suture of this ligament. Methods We conducted a research of anatomical articles about vascular and nerve structures located in the SSL region, in order to increase the anatomical knowledge and show the best placement of sutures to reduce complications related to SSL suspension procedures. Results We showed the medial part of the SSL to be most suitable for the placement of the suture during SSL fixation procedures, in order to avoid nerve and vessel injuries. However, nerves to the coccygeus and levator ani muscle can course on the medial part of the SSL, the portion of the SSL where we recommended to pass the suture. Conclusions Knowledge of the SSL anatomy is crucial and during surgical training it is clearly indicated to stay far away (almost 2 cm) from the ischial spine to avoid nerve and vascular injuries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-023-05496-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giraudet, G., Ruffolo, A. F., Lallemant, M., & Cosson, M.
Affiliations
  • Université de Lille (FR)
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
  • Franche-Comté Électronique Mécanique Thermique et Optique - Sciences et Technologies (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
Corresponding author
Ruffolo, Alessandro Ferdinando
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2023-03-10
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
2329-2332
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W4323804364
Cited by
20
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
sacrospinous ligament, pelvic organ prolapse, sacrospinous ligament fixation, ligament anatomy, suture placement, nerve injury, vascular injury, chronic pelvic pain, surgical complications, ischial spine, surgical dissection
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Ligaments, Ligaments, Articular, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Vagina, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Floor, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review