Systematic Review of Evidence for Conservative Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Younger Women
Open accessAbstract
Introduction Treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is poorly understood in younger women as the majority of prolapse research is conducted in the older population. There is an urgent need to evaluate conservative POP treatments for management in younger women due to high surgical complications and reoperation rates. Methods Systematic review of the literature following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. Included studies were of conservative treatments in women younger than 51 years old. Results From 416 retrieved studies, nine were included in the analysis. Two of three studies found pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) significantly benefited patient reported outcome measures (PROM) compared to educational material. One of three studies found significant improvement in PROM using biofeedback in addition to PFMT versus PFMT alone. Electrical stimulation with PFMT versus PFMT alone (one study) showed significant additional benefit of the combined treatment. Biofeedback and electrical stimulation in combination with PFMT versus PFMT alone (one study) was found to provide significant additional benefits. One compared pessary use to no intervention but stopped early due to slow recruitment. Conclusion PFMT improves patient reported outcomes in younger women with POP. Electrical stimulation and biofeedback are useful adjuncts to PFMT. The gap in research investigating the effect of pessaries in younger women warrants further study.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are very little data on the use of pessaries in younger women and whether or not pessary use for postpartum prolapse symptoms improves pelvic floor recovery for women and leads to anatomical remodelling.
“There are very little data on the use of pessaries in younger women and whether or not pessary use for postpartum prolapse symptoms improves pelvic floor recovery for women and leads to anatomical remodelling [46].”
From How Can We Improve the Assessment and Indifferent Outcomes From Pelvic Organ Prolapse Management From Conservative and Surgical Therapies? ICI‐RS 2025 (2026) · cites this paper as [46]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 7
- Authors
- Brown, C. A., Toong, P. J., Kearney, R., Hagen, S., & McPeake, J.
- Affiliations
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- St Mary's Hospital (GB)
- Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Brown, Claire A.
- Venue
- International Urogynecology Journal
- Published
- 2024-12-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 477-490
- ISSN
- 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-3023
- OpenAlex
- W4405323825
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ResearchOnline (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Addenbrooke’s Charitable Trust, Cambridge University Hospitals (900414)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Keywords
- pelvic organ prolapse, young women, conservative treatment, pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback, electrical stimulation, pessary, patient-reported outcomes, teaching materials
- MeSH terms
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Conservative Treatment, Adult, Age Factors, Biofeedback, Psychology, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Pessaries, Pelvic Floor, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review