Cited by 187Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesBone health and osteoporosis researchBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Anxiolytics, sedatives, antidepressants, neuroleptics and the risk of fracture

Vestergaard, P., Rejnmark, L., Mosekilde, L.·2006·Osteoporosis International

Abstract

Introduction Our objective was to study the association between fracture risk and the use of anxiolytics and sedatives (benzodiazepines, etc.), neuroleptics and antidepressants.Subjects and methods This was a case control study. All cases consisted of subjects who had sustained a fracture during the year 2000 (n=124,655). For each case, three controls (n=373,962) matched for age and gender were randomly drawn from the background population. Exposure was defined as the use of neuroleptics, antidepressants and anxiolytics/sedatives, psychiatric disease (manic depressive states, schizophrenia, other psychoses), and other confounders. The effect of dose was examined as a defined daily dose per day (DDD/day). The values referred to are confounder-adjusted.Results For anxiolytics and sedatives, there was a small increase in overall fracture risk (OR: around 1.1) even with limited doses (<0.1 DDD/day). No dose-response relationship was observed for anxiolytics and sedatives. For neuroleptics, a limited increase in overall fracture risk was observed (OR: around 1.2 from <0.05 DDD/day with no dose-response relationship). For antidepressants, a dose-response relationship was observed for fracture risk (OR: increasing from 1.15, 95% CI: 1.11-1.19 at <0.15 DDD/day to 1.40, 95% CI: 1.35-1.46 for >or=0.75 DDD/day). The risk of fracture was higher with selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors than with tricyclic antidepressants.Conclusions Small increases in fracture risk were seen with the use of anxiolytics and sedatives and neuroleptics without a dose-response relationship. The increase may be linked to an increased risk of falls. For antidepressants, a dose-response relationship was found, with a higher fracture risk for selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00198-005-0065-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 187

Authors
Vestergaard, P., Rejnmark, L., & Mosekilde, L.
Affiliations
Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Vestergaard, P.
Venue
Osteoporosis International
Published
2006-03-07
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
807-816
ISSN
  • 0937-941X (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-2965
OpenAlex
W2108582592
Cited by
187
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 29
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Osteoporosis International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
fracture risk, anxiolytics, sedatives, benzodiazepines, antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, dose-response relationship, falls, psychiatric medication, osteoporosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Child, Child, Preschool, Denmark, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Hospital Records, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Antipsychotic Agents, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Fractures, Bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review