Cited by 84Bone health and osteoporosis researchNutrition and Health in AgingBone health and treatments

Efficacy of recreational football on bone health, body composition, and physical functioning in men with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy: 32-week follow-up of the FC prostate randomised controlled trial

Uth, J., Hornstrup, T., Christensen, J. F., Christensen, K. B., Jørgensen, N. R., Schmidt, J. F., Brasso, K., Jakobsen, M. D. +6 more·2016·Osteoporosis International

Abstract

Unlabelled Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer (PCa) impairs musculoskeletal health. We evaluated the efficacy of 32-week football training on bone mineral density (BMD) and physical functioning in men undergoing ADT for PCa. Football training improved the femoral shaft and total hip BMD and physical functioning parameters compared to control.Introduction ADT is a mainstay in PCa management. Side effects include decreased bone and muscle strength and increased fracture rates. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of 32 weeks of football training on BMD, bone turnover markers (BTMs), body composition, and physical functioning in men with PCa undergoing ADT.Methods Men receiving ADT >6 months (n = 57) were randomly allocated to a football training group (FTG) (n = 29) practising 2-3 times per week for 45-60 min or to a standard care control group (CON) (n = 28) for 32 weeks. Outcomes were total hip, femoral shaft, femoral neck and lumbar spine (L2-L4) BMD and systemic BTMs (procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide, osteocalcin, C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen). Additionally, physical functioning (postural balance, jump height, repeated chair rise, stair climbing) was evaluated.Results Thirty-two-week follow-up measures were obtained for FTG (n = 21) and for CON (n = 20), respectively. Analysis of mean changes from baseline to 32 weeks showed significant differences between FTG and CON in right (0.015 g/cm(2)) and left (0.017 g/cm(2)) total hip and in right (0.018 g/cm(2)) and left (0.024 g/cm(2)) femoral shaft BMD, jump height (1.7 cm) and stair climbing (-0.21 s) all in favour of FTG (p < 0.05). No other significant between-group differences were observed.Conclusions Compared to standard care, 32 weeks of football training improved BMD at clinically important femoral sites and parameters of physical functioning in men undergoing ADT for PCa.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00198-015-3399-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Understanding dose response is limited by a paucity of trials directly comparing two or more exercise training levels or settings.

    “a further understanding of dose response is limited by a paucity of trials that directly compare two or more levels of exercise training (e.g., high versus low intensity exercise) on cancer-related outcomes(77) or compare settings (e.g., supervised versus home-based)75.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 84

Authors
Uth, J., Hornstrup, T., Christensen, J. F., Christensen, K. B., Jørgensen, N. R., Schmidt, J. F., Brasso, K., Jakobsen, M. D., Sundstrup, E., Andersen, L. L., Rørth, M., Midtgaard, J., Krustrup, P., & Helge, E. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • National Research Centre for the Working Environment (DK)
Corresponding author
Uth, J.
Venue
Osteoporosis International
Published
2015-11-16
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
1507-1518
ISSN
  • 0937-941X (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-2965
OpenAlex
W2174477255
Cited by
84
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Osteoporosis International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Preben og Anna Simonsens Fond
  • The Beckett Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
Keywords
prostate cancer, androgen deprivation therapy, football training, leisure-time physical activity, bone mineral density, femoral diaphysis, hip bone density, bone turnover markers, physical function, body composition, osteoporosis prevention
MeSH terms
Aged, Androgen Antagonists, Body Composition, Bone Diseases, Metabolic, Postural Balance, Exercise Therapy, Femur, Follow-Up Studies, Hip Joint, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Physical Fitness, Prostatic Neoplasms, Soccer, Bone Density, Muscle, Skeletal, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal, Muscle Strength, Recreation Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review