Cited by 40Bone health and osteoporosis researchCancer survivorship and careBone health and treatments

The effect of exercise on bone mineral density in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Dalla Via, J., Daly, R. M., Fraser, S. F.·2018·Osteoporosis International

Abstract

Purpose Certain cancer treatments are associated with bone loss and increased fracture risk. Weight-bearing impact exercise, resistance training or the combination, are recommended to preserve or improve bone mineral density (BMD) inhealthy older adults, but their efficacy in cancer survivors is less well understood. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised control trials (RCT) was to review the evidence regarding the role of exercise to counteract cancer treatment-induced bone loss.Methods Four databases were searched systematically with 12 RCTs of at least 6-month duration investigating the effects of exercise on BMD compared to a control group in adult cancer survivors identified.Results Meta-analysis was completed using available data from six studies enrolling 814 participants, with lumbar spine, femoral neck and/or total hip BMD as the primary outcome measures. Overall, there was no significant benefit of exercise compared to controls on BMD at the lumbar spine (0.0071 g/cm , 95% CI -0.0002 to 0.0145, p = 0.057), femoral neck (0.0044 g/cm , 95% CI -0.0005 to 0.0093, p = 0.077), or total hip (0.0024 g/cm , 95% CI -0.0038 to 0.0086, p = 0.443). Subgroup analysis revealed a positive effect on lumbar spine BMD in three studies implementing a combined resistance and impact exercise intervention (0.015 g/cm , 95% CI 0.003 to 0.028, p = 0.019).Conclusions From the evidence available, exercise may not be sufficient to improve bone health in cancer survivors, but given the heterogeneity in the participant characteristics and several exercise programs which may not have been designed to specifically optimise bone health, these findings should be interpreted with caution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00198-017-4237-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 40

Authors
Dalla Via, J., Daly, R. M., & Fraser, S. F.
Affiliations
Deakin University (AU)
Venue
Osteoporosis International
Published
2017-10-02
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
287-303
ISSN
  • 0937-941X (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-2965
OpenAlex
W2762367688
Cited by
40
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Osteoporosis International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
Keywords
physical activity, bone mineral density, cancer survivors, cancer treatment-induced bone loss, resistance training, lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip, bone health, fracture risk
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Adult, Exercise Therapy, Femur Neck, Humans, Lumbar Vertebrae, Neoplasms, Osteoporosis, Exercise, Bone Density, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review