Cited by 129Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchAnimal testing and alternativesNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

A 3-dimensional human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived model to detect developmental neurotoxicity of nanoparticles

Open access
Hoelting, Lisa, Scheinhardt, Benjamin, Bondarenko, Olesja, Schildknecht, Stefan, Kapitza, Marion, Tanavde, Vivek, Tan, Betty, Lee, Qian Yi +3 more·2013·Archives of Toxicology

Abstract

Nanoparticles (NPs) have been shown to accumulate in organs, cross the blood-brain barrier and placenta, and have the potential to elicit developmental neurotoxicity (DNT). Here, we developed a human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived 3-dimensional (3-D) in vitro model that allows for testing of potential developmental neurotoxicants. Early central nervous system PAX6(+) precursor cells were generated from hESCs and differentiated further within 3-D structures. The 3-D model was characterized for neural marker expression revealing robust differentiation toward neuronal precursor cells, and gene expression profiling suggested a predominantly forebrain-like development. Altered neural gene expression due to exposure to non-cytotoxic concentrations of the known developmental neurotoxicant, methylmercury, indicated that the 3-D model could detect DNT. To test for specific toxicity of NPs, chemically inert polyethylene NPs (PE-NPs) were chosen. They penetrated deep into the 3-D structures and impacted gene expression at non-cytotoxic concentrations. NOTCH pathway genes such as HES5 and NOTCH1 were reduced in expression, as well as downstream neuronal precursor genes such as NEUROD1 and ASCL1. FOXG1, a patterning marker, was also reduced. As loss of function of these genes results in severe nervous system impairments in mice, our data suggest that the 3-D hESC-derived model could be used to test for Nano-DNT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00204-012-0984-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Activation of ion channels in human lungs after exposure to PS nanoplastics has been observed, and PE nanoplastic were shown to enter human stem cells in vitro impacting gene expression at concentrations below cytotoxicity.

    “Additionally, the activation of ion channels in human lungs aer the exposure to PS nanoplastics has also been observed, 162 and PE nanoplastic were shown to enter human stem cells in vitro impacting gene expression at concentrations below cytotoxicity.163”

    From The fate of plastic in the ocean environment – a minireview (2021) · cites this paper as [163]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 129

Authors
Hoelting, L., Scheinhardt, B., Bondarenko, O., Schildknecht, S., Kapitza, M., Tanavde, V., Tan, B., Lee, Q. Y., Mecking, S., Leist, M., & Kadereit, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
  • National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics (EE)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
Corresponding author
Kadereit, Suzanne
Venue
Archives of Toxicology
Published
2012-12-02
Volume
87
Issue
4
Pages
721-733
ISSN
  • 0340-5761 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0738
OpenAlex
W2147306106
Cited by
129
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 3
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Toxicology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
developmental neurotoxicity, nanoparticles, human embryonic stem cells, 3D in vitro model, methylmercury, neural progenitor cells, Pax6, forebrain development, Notch signaling, Hes5, Notch1, FOXG1, NeuroD1, ASCL1
MeSH terms
Cell Differentiation, Cell Line, Cell Survival, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Methylmercury Compounds, Neurons, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Cells, Immobilized, Cell Culture Techniques, Gene Expression Profiling, Polyethylene, Embryonic Stem Cells, Nanoparticles, Embryoid Bodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review