Antioxidants and antioxidant methods: an updated overview
Abstract
Antioxidants had a growing interest owing to their protective roles in food and pharmaceutical products against oxidative deterioration and in the body and against oxidative stress-mediated pathological processes. Screening of antioxidant properties of plants and plant-derived compounds requires appropriate methods, which address the mechanism of antioxidant activity and focus on the kinetics of the reactions including the antioxidants. Many studies evaluating the antioxidant activity of various samples of research interest using different methods in food and human health have been conducted. These methods are classified, described, and discussed in this review. Methods based on inhibited autoxidation are the most suited for termination-enhancing antioxidants and for chain-breaking antioxidants, while different specific studies are needed for preventive antioxidants. For this purpose, the most common methods used in vitro determination of antioxidant capacity of food constituents were examined. Also, a selection of chemical testing methods was critically reviewed and highlighted. In addition, their advantages, disadvantages, limitations and usefulness were discussed and investigated for pure molecules and raw extracts. The effect and influence of the reaction medium on the performance of antioxidants are also addressed. Hence, this overview provides a basis and rationale for developing standardized antioxidant methods for the food, nutraceuticals, and dietary supplement industries. In addition, the most important advantages and shortcomings of each method were detected and highlighted. The chemical principles of these methods are outlined and critically discussed. The chemical principles of methods of 2,2'-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonate) radical (ABTS·+) scavenging, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH·) radical scavenging, Fe 3+-Fe 2+ transformation assay, ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay, cupric ions (Cu 2+) reducing power assay (Cuprac), Folin-Ciocalteu reducing capacity (FCR assay), peroxyl radical (ROO·), superoxide radical anion (O 2·-), hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2) scavenging assay, hydroxyl radical (OH·) scavenging assay, singlet oxygen (1 O 2) quenching assay, nitric oxide radical (NO·) scavenging assay and chemiluminescence assay are outlined and critically discussed. Also, the general antioxidant aspects of main food components were discussed by a number of methods, which are currently used for the detection of antioxidant properties of food components. This review consists of two main sections. The first section is devoted to the main components in the food and pharmaceutical applications. The second general section comprises some definitions of the main antioxidant methods commonly used for the determination of the antioxidant activity of components. In addition, some chemical, mechanistic and kinetic basis, and technical details of the used methods are given.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Variations in antioxidant requirements and processing could be greater during space travel as many physical factors could intervene in the metabolism of drugs or endogenous antioxidant protection.
“These variations could be greater during space travel as many physical factors could intervene in the metabolism of drugs or endogenous antioxidant protection125,214.”
Dysregulation of peroxynitrite has been linked with cardiovascular, neurological, and cancer diseases.
“Dysregulation of peroxynitrite has been linked with cardiovascular, neurological, and cancer diseases (Gulcin 2020).”
From Reactive Oxygen Species, Toxicity, Oxidative Stress, and Antioxidants: Chronic Diseases and Aging (2023) · cites this paper as Gulcin 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 423 · Cited by 2,205
- Authors
- Gulcin, İ.
- Venue
- Archives of Toxicology
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 651-715
- ISSN
- 0340-5761 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0738
- OpenAlex
- W3011686755
- Cited by
- 2,205
- References
- 423
- Citations by year
- 2026: 280 · 2025: 433 · 2024: 464 · 2023: 401 · 2022: 330 · 2021: 224 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 22.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Toxicology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Free Radicals and Antioxidants
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
- Keywords
- antioxidants, antioxidant activity assay, DPPH radical scavenging, ABTS radical scavenging, FRAP, CUPRAC assay, Folin-Ciocalteu assay, peroxyl radical scavenging, superoxide radical scavenging, hydroxyl radical scavenging, singlet oxygen quenching, nitric oxide scavenging, chemiluminescence assay, oxidative stress, dietary antioxidants, nutraceuticals, dietary supplements, phytochemicals
- MeSH terms
- Antioxidants, Humans, Oxidation-Reduction, Superoxides, Free Radical Scavengers, Reactive Oxygen Species
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review