Cited by 3Carcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentImmunotoxicology and immune responsesAnimal testing and alternatives

How the methodology determines the outcome of the in vitro micronucleus assay (OECD TG 487): a comparison of the MicroFlow and the microscopic evaluation approach highlights the impact of cytotoxicity/cytostasis metrics in V79 cells for matrine

Open access
Fischer, Benjamin Christian, Musengi, Yemurai, Herrmann, Kristin, Kneuer, Carsten, König, Jeannette·2026·Archives of Toxicology

Abstract

The in vitro micronucleus (MN) test (OECD TG 487) has become the gold standard in various regulatory silos for assessing compounds for their potential to cause clastogenicity. Its main advantages are the reproducibility and robustness, as well as the ability to investigate both structural and numerical chromosome damage, i.e. clastogenicity and aneuploidy. A disadvantage, however, can be seen in the resource-intensive microscopical evaluation. Consequently, faster, high-throughput methods, such as flow cytometry have been developed and integrated into the test guideline protocol. Regardless of the evaluation method applied, results must be consistent to justify the mutual acceptance of data established for OECD TG tests performed under GLP. This may be particularly challenging for substances of lower potency. Here, we present two case studies comparing the results of the MN test according to TG 487 with microscopic evaluation with those obtained using the MicroFlow kit (Litron Laboratories). The MN tests were performed with V79 cells without cytochalasin B, incubated for 4 h (with and without metabolic activation) or 24 h with 0.5, 1.0, 1.25, 1.375 and 1.5 mg/ml matrine or 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mg/ml oxymatrine. These quinolizidine alkaloids, found in liquorice confectionary and organic green tea are suspected to be aneugenic or clastogenic. The MicroFlow test showed statistically significant increases in micronuclei formation from 1.0 mg/ml on, albeit with slightly reduced relative survival, the metric for cytotoxicity recommended for this method at the time of the assay implementation. Complementary testing using microscopical evaluation did not support these results due to excessive cytotoxicity observed at matrine concentrations of 1.0 mg/ml and higher. Additionally, mechanistic studies using the ToxTracker ACE assay indicated that matrine is not a direct clastogen. Herein, we illustrate and discuss the importance of appropriate metrics for cell proliferation and cytotoxicity which should account for the toxicological properties of the test compounds. The aim is to assure consistency between OECD TG-compliant evaluation methods and to avoid misleading positive findings when evaluating the biological relevance of increased micronuclei formation accompanied by cytotoxicity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00204-025-04271-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Fischer et al.'s comparison, an apparent positive response in the MicroFlow assay was not confirmed by microscopic evaluation when cytotoxicity/cytostasis was assessed using count-based metrics recommended for micronucleus tests without cytochalasin B.

    “In their comparison of flow-cytometric evaluation using the MicroFlow kit (Litron Laboratories) and microscopic evaluation, an apparent positive response observed in the MicroFlow assay was not confirmed by microscopic evaluation when cytotoxicity/cytostasis was assessed using count-based metrics recommended for micronucleus tests without cytochalasin B.”
  • Fischer et al. showed in V79 cells that methodological handling of cytotoxicity and cytostasis can determine whether an apparent micronucleus response is accepted as relevant or rejected as toxicity-associated and non-scorable.

    “Fischer et al. showed in V79 cells that the methodological handling of cytotoxicity and cytostasis can determine whether an apparent micronucleus response is accepted as relevant or rejected as toxicity-associated and non-scorable.”
  • Cytotoxicity and cytostasis metrics are not auxiliary measurements in the in vitro micronucleus assay, but assay-defining constraints for valid concentration selection and interpretation.

    “This supports the view that cytotoxicity and cytostasis metrics are not auxiliary measurements in the in vitro micronucleus assay, but assay-defining constraints for valid concentration selection and interpretation (Fischer et al., 2026).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Abd-Alla HI, Souguir D, Radwan MO (2021) Genus Sophora: a comprehensive review on secondary chemical metabolites and their biological aspects from past achievements to future perspectives. Arch Pharm Res 44(11):903–986. 10.1007/s12272-021-01354-2 34907492 PMC8671057 · DOI
  2. Avlasevich SL, Bryce SM, Cairns SE, Dertinger SD (2006) In vitro micronucleus scoring by flow cytometry: differential staining of micronuclei versus apoptotic and necrotic chromatin enhances assay reliability. Environ Mol Mutagen 47(1):56–66. 10.1002/em.20170 16180205 · DOI
  3. Bryce SM, Bemis JC, Avlasevich SL, Dertinger SD (2007) In vitro micronucleus assay scored by flow cytometry provides a comprehensive evaluation of cytogenetic damage and cytotoxicity. Mutat Res 630(1–2):78–91. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2007.03.002 17434794 PMC1950716 · DOI
  4. Bryce SM, Avlasevich SL, Bemis JC et al (2008) Interlaboratory evaluation of a flow cytometric, high content in vitro micronucleus assay. Mutat Res 650(2):181–195. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2007.11.006 18182318 PMC2705921 · DOI
  5. Che JH, Yun JW, Kim YS et al (2015) Genotoxicity and subchronic toxicity of Sophorae radix in rats: hepatotoxic and genotoxic potential. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 71(3):379–387. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.01.012 25640205 · DOI
  6. Dertinger SD, Li D, Beevers C et al (2023) Assessing the quality and making appropriate use of historical negative control data: A report of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT). Environ Mol Mutagen. 10.1002/em.22541 37097075 PMC10598234 · DOI
  7. Fenech M (2007) Cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay. Nat Protoc 2(5):1084–1104. 10.1038/nprot.2007.77 17546000 · DOI
  8. Fischer BC, Foil DH, Kadic A, Kneuer C, König J, Herrmann K (2024a) Pobody’s Nerfect: (Q)SAR works well for predicting bacterial mutagenicity of pesticides and their metabolites, but predictions for clastogenicity in vitro have room for improvement. Comput Toxicol. 10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100318 · DOI
  9. Fischer BC, Musengi Y, Konig J et al (2024b) Matrine and Oxymatrine: evaluating the gene mutation potential using in silico tools and the bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test). Mutagenesis 39(1):32–42. 10.1093/mutage/gead032 37877816 PMC10851102 · DOI
  10. Gu L-l, Shen Z-l, Li Y-L, Bao Y-Q, Lu H (2018) Oxymatrine causes hepatotoxicity by promoting the phosphorylation of JNK and induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress mediated by ROS in LO2 cells. Mol Cells 41(5):401–412. 10.14348/molcells.2018.2180 29754474 PMC5974617 · DOI
  11. Hendriks G, Atallah M, Raamsman M et al (2011) Sensitive DsRed fluorescence-based reporter cell systems for genotoxicity and oxidative stress assessment. Mutat Res 709–710:49–59. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.02.013 21382384 · DOI
  12. Hendriks G, Atallah M, Morolli B et al (2012) The ToxTracker assay: novel GFP reporter systems that provide mechanistic insight into the genotoxic properties of chemicals. Toxicol Sci 125(1):285–298. 10.1093/toxsci/kfr281 22003191 · DOI
  13. Hendriks G, Derr RS, Misovic B, Morolli B, Calleja FM, Vrieling H (2016) The extended ToxTracker assay discriminates between induction of DNA damage, oxidative stress, and protein misfolding. Toxicol Sci 150(1):190–203. 10.1093/toxsci/kfv323 26719371 PMC5009621 · DOI
  14. Hetz C, Zhang K, Kaufman RJ (2020) Mechanisms, regulation and functions of the unfolded protein response. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 21(8):421–438. 10.1038/s41580-020-0250-z 32457508 PMC8867924 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Honma M (2011) Cytotoxicity measurement in in vitro chromosome aberration test and micronucleus test. Mutat Res 724(1–2):86–87. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.05.003 21679773 · DOI
  16. Kluxen FM, Weber K, Strupp C et al (2021) Using historical control data in bioassays for regulatory toxicology. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 125:105024. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105024 34364928 · DOI
  17. Lan X, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Liu Y, Xu F (2020) Oxymatrine exerts organ- and tissue-protective effects by regulating inflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and fibrosis: from bench to bedside. Pharmacol Res 151:104541. 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104541 31733326 · DOI
  18. Li Y, Wang G, Liu J, Ouyang L (2020) Quinolizidine alkaloids derivatives from Sophora alopecuroides Linn: bioactivities, structure-activity relationships and preliminary molecular mechanisms. Eur J Med Chem. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111972 31884408 · DOI
  19. Lu H, Zhang L, Gu LL, Hou BY, Du GH (2016) Oxymatrine induces liver injury through JNK signalling pathway mediated by TNF-alpha in vivo. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 119(4):405–411. 10.1111/bcpt.12608 27097917 · DOI
  20. Mao L, Henderson G (2007) Antifeedant activity and acute and residual toxicity of alkaloids from Sophora flavescens (Leguminosae) against Formosan subterranean termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). J Econ Entomol 100(3):866–870. 10.1093/jee/100.3.866 17598549 · DOI
  21. Menssen M (2023) The calculation of historical control limits in toxicology: do’s, don’ts and open issues from a statistical perspective. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 892:503695. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2023.503695 37973293 · DOI
  22. Nicolette J, Diehl M, Sonders P, Bryce S, Blomme E (2011) In vitro micronucleus screening of pharmaceutical candidates by flow cytometry in Chinese hamster V79 cells. Environ Mol Mutagen 52(5):355–362. 10.1002/em.20631 20963813 · DOI
  23. Tabas I, Ron D (2011) Integrating the mechanisms of apoptosis induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress. Nat Cell Biol 13(3):184–190. 10.1038/ncb0311-184 21364565 PMC3107571 · DOI
  24. Yin X-j, Liu D-x, Wang H, Zhou Y (1991) A study on the mutagenicity of 102 raw pharmaceuticals used in Chinese traditional medicine. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol 260(1):73–82 2027343 · DOI
  25. You L, Yang C, Du Y et al (2020) A systematic review of the pharmacology, toxicology and pharmacokinetics of Matrine. Front Pharmacol 11:01067. 10.3389/fphar.2020.01067 33041782 PMC7526649 · DOI
  26. Zhang H, Chen L, Sun X, Yang Q, Wan L, Guo C (2020) Matrine: a promising natural product with various pharmacological activities. Front Pharmacol. 10.3389/fphar.2020.00588 32477114 PMC7232545 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fischer, B. C., Musengi, Y., Herrmann, K., Kneuer, C., & König, J.
Affiliations
German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) (DE)
Corresponding author
Fischer, Benjamin Christian
Venue
Archives of Toxicology
Published
2026-01-14
Volume
100
Issue
4
Pages
1603-1615
ISSN
  • 0340-5761 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0738
OpenAlex
W7124169202
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
9.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Toxicology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
Keywords
micronucleus test, matrine, oxymatrine, quinolizidine alkaloids, clastogenicity, aneugenicity, V79 cells, microscale flow, cytotoxicity, cytostasis, relative survival, metabolic activation, data consistency, high-throughput flow cytometry
MeSH terms
Matrines, Alkaloids, Animals, Cell Line, Cell Survival, Cricetulus, Cricetinae, Microscopy, Mutagens, Quinolizines, Micronucleus Tests, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review