The role of oxidative stress and antioxidant therapy in cisplatin neurotoxicity: preclinical evidence in the last decade
Open accessAbstract
Cisplatin remains one of the most effective chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of several tumors. However, its use is limited by dose-dependent and cumulative neurotoxicity, which affects the peripheral nervous system, hypothalamus, prefrontal cortex, cerebellum, retina and optic nerve. Currently, there is no neuroprotective strategy against cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity. Studies in the last decade have consolidated the role of oxidative stress as a central molecular event in cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity. A wide array of antioxidant-based strategies from natural compounds to repurposed drugs has been investigated in animal models as neuroprotective agents. In general, these compounds act directly through free radical scavenging, or indirectly, by activating the Nrf2 pathway, which induces the expression of antioxidant defense enzymes. This review approaches the role of oxidative stress in preclinical studies on cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity from the last decade, and evaluates the most promising antioxidant interventions, with the focus on cognitive impairment, peripheral neuropathy, ocular toxicity, anxiety and depression. The link between cisplatin neurotoxicity and neurodegenerative diseases as well as the emerging novel therapeutic strategies to replace cisplatin chemotherapy are discussed. The need for future studies in tumor-bearing animal models to investigate interferences with the antitumor efficacy of cisplatin is pointed out as a critical requirement for clinical translation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 1 · Cited by 1
- Authors
- dos Santos, N. A. G., dos Santos, J. M., & dos Santos, A. C.
- Venue
- Archives of Toxicology
- Published
- 2026-04-28
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2285-2305
- ISSN
- 0340-5761 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0738
- PMC
- PMC13221339
- OpenAlex
- W7158248224
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Archives of Toxicology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Universidade De São Paulo
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Chemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Keywords
- cisplatin, neurotoxicity, oxidative stress, antioxidant therapy, neuroprotection, Nrf2 signaling, peripheral neuropathy, cognitive impairment, ocular toxicity, anxiety and depression, neurodegenerative diseases, repurposed drugs, natural compounds, chemotherapy toxicity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Antioxidants, Cisplatin, Humans, Oxidative Stress, Neuroprotective Agents, Neurotoxicity Syndromes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review