Cited by 1Cancer Treatment and PharmacologyChemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigationCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

The role of oxidative stress and antioxidant therapy in cisplatin neurotoxicity: preclinical evidence in the last decade

Open access
dos Santos, Neife Aparecida Guinaim, dos Santos, Júlia Maiara, dos Santos, Antônio Cardozo·2026·Archives of Toxicology

Abstract

Cisplatin remains one of the most effective chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of several tumors. However, its use is limited by dose-dependent and cumulative neurotoxicity, which affects the peripheral nervous system, hypothalamus, prefrontal cortex, cerebellum, retina and optic nerve. Currently, there is no neuroprotective strategy against cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity. Studies in the last decade have consolidated the role of oxidative stress as a central molecular event in cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity. A wide array of antioxidant-based strategies from natural compounds to repurposed drugs has been investigated in animal models as neuroprotective agents. In general, these compounds act directly through free radical scavenging, or indirectly, by activating the Nrf2 pathway, which induces the expression of antioxidant defense enzymes. This review approaches the role of oxidative stress in preclinical studies on cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity from the last decade, and evaluates the most promising antioxidant interventions, with the focus on cognitive impairment, peripheral neuropathy, ocular toxicity, anxiety and depression. The link between cisplatin neurotoxicity and neurodegenerative diseases as well as the emerging novel therapeutic strategies to replace cisplatin chemotherapy are discussed. The need for future studies in tumor-bearing animal models to investigate interferences with the antitumor efficacy of cisplatin is pointed out as a critical requirement for clinical translation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00204-026-04398-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 1 · Cited by 1

Authors
dos Santos, N. A. G., dos Santos, J. M., & dos Santos, A. C.
Venue
Archives of Toxicology
Published
2026-04-28
Volume
100
Issue
6
Pages
2285-2305
ISSN
  • 0340-5761 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0738
OpenAlex
W7158248224
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Toxicology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Universidade De São Paulo
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Chemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
cisplatin, neurotoxicity, oxidative stress, antioxidant therapy, neuroprotection, Nrf2 signaling, peripheral neuropathy, cognitive impairment, ocular toxicity, anxiety and depression, neurodegenerative diseases, repurposed drugs, natural compounds, chemotherapy toxicity
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Antioxidants, Cisplatin, Humans, Oxidative Stress, Neuroprotective Agents, Neurotoxicity Syndromes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review