Effect of low doses of ?9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on the extinction of cocaine-induced and amphetamine-induced conditioned place preference learning in rats
Abstract
Rationale Using the place-preference conditioning paradigm, we evaluated the potential of the two most prominent cannabinoids found in marijuana, the psychoactive component delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC) and the nonpsychoactive component cannabidiol (CBD), to potentiate extinction of a cocaine-induced and an amphetamine-induced conditioned place preference in rats. Methods To determine the effects of pretreatment with delta9-THC or CBD on extinction, a cocaine-induced and amphetamine-induced place preference was first established. Rats were then given an extinction trial, during which they were confined to the treatment-paired floor for 15 min. Thirty minutes prior to the extinction trial, they were injected with a low dose of delta9-THC (0.5 mg/kg), CBD (5 mg/kg) or vehicle. The potential of the CB1 receptor antagonist, SR141716, to reverse the effects of delta9-THC or CBD was also evaluated. To determine the hedonic effects of CBD, one distinctive floor was paired with CBD (5 mg/kg) and another with saline. Finally, to determine the effect of delta9-THC.or CBD on the establishment and/or the expression of a place preference during four cycles of conditioning trials, rats were injected with delta9-THC (0.25-1 mg/kg), CBD (5 mg/kg) or vehicle 25 min prior to receiving an injection of amphetamine followed by placement on the treatment floor; on alternate days, they received injections of vehicle followed by saline and placement on the nontreatment floor. The rats the…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CBD possibly reduces drug-seeking behaviors.
“and possibly reduces drug-seeking behaviors (Parker et al, 2004; Ren et al, 2009; Morgan et al, 2010).”
From Cannabidiol Reduces the Anxiety Induced by Simulated Public Speaking in Treatment-Naïve Social Phobia Patients (2011) · cites this paper as Parker et al, 2004
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 171
- Authors
- Parker, L. A., Burton, P., Sorge, R. E., Yakiwchuk, C., & Mechoulam, R.
- Affiliations
- Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
- Concordia University (CA)
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Parker, Linda A.
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 2004-05-11
- Volume
- 175
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 360-366
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- OpenAlex
- W2106232499
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol, extinction, conditioned place preference, cocaine, amphetamine, CB1 receptor, SR141716, drug addiction
- MeSH terms
- Rimonabant, Amphetamine, Animals, Cannabidiol, Cocaine, Conditioning, Operant, Extinction, Psychological, Learning, Male, Piperidines, Pyrazoles, Dronabinol, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review