Cited by 171Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Effect of low doses of ?9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on the extinction of cocaine-induced and amphetamine-induced conditioned place preference learning in rats

Parker, Linda A., Burton, Page, Sorge, Robert E., Yakiwchuk, Christine, Mechoulam, Raphael·2004·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale Using the place-preference conditioning paradigm, we evaluated the potential of the two most prominent cannabinoids found in marijuana, the psychoactive component delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC) and the nonpsychoactive component cannabidiol (CBD), to potentiate extinction of a cocaine-induced and an amphetamine-induced conditioned place preference in rats. Methods To determine the effects of pretreatment with delta9-THC or CBD on extinction, a cocaine-induced and amphetamine-induced place preference was first established. Rats were then given an extinction trial, during which they were confined to the treatment-paired floor for 15 min. Thirty minutes prior to the extinction trial, they were injected with a low dose of delta9-THC (0.5 mg/kg), CBD (5 mg/kg) or vehicle. The potential of the CB1 receptor antagonist, SR141716, to reverse the effects of delta9-THC or CBD was also evaluated. To determine the hedonic effects of CBD, one distinctive floor was paired with CBD (5 mg/kg) and another with saline. Finally, to determine the effect of delta9-THC.or CBD on the establishment and/or the expression of a place preference during four cycles of conditioning trials, rats were injected with delta9-THC (0.25-1 mg/kg), CBD (5 mg/kg) or vehicle 25 min prior to receiving an injection of amphetamine followed by placement on the treatment floor; on alternate days, they received injections of vehicle followed by saline and placement on the nontreatment floor. The rats the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-004-1825-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 171

Authors
Parker, L. A., Burton, P., Sorge, R. E., Yakiwchuk, C., & Mechoulam, R.
Affiliations
  • Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
  • Concordia University (CA)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Parker, Linda A.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2004-05-11
Volume
175
Issue
3
Pages
360-366
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2106232499
Cited by
171
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol, extinction, conditioned place preference, cocaine, amphetamine, CB1 receptor, SR141716, drug addiction
MeSH terms
Rimonabant, Amphetamine, Animals, Cannabidiol, Cocaine, Conditioning, Operant, Extinction, Psychological, Learning, Male, Piperidines, Pyrazoles, Dronabinol, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review