Cited by 47Stress Responses and CortisolNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Surgical and pharmacological suppression of glucocorticoids prevents the enhancement of morphine conditioned place preference by uncontrollable stress in rats

Der-Avakian, Andre, Will, Matthew J., Bland, Sondra T., Deak, Terrence, Nguyen, Kien T., Schmid, Megan J., Spencer, Robert L., Watkins, Linda R. +1 more·2005·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale Stress and one of the physiological components of most stress responses, glucocorticoid hormones (CORT), are known to influence the rewarding effects of a number of drugs of abuse. We have previously shown that an acute uncontrollable stressor (inescapable shock, IS) potentiates the rewarding effects of morphine using conditioned place preference (CPP).Objectives The following experiments were conducted to determine the role of CORT in this process.Methods First, the CORT response to 3.0 mg/kg morphine was measured in male Sprague-Dawley rats 24 h following exposure to IS. Second, we determined the effect of adrenalectomy (ADX) on the IS-potentiated CPP to morphine. Finally, we used the temporary CORT synthesis inhibitors metyrapone and aminoglutethimide to determine the necessity of CORT rises during either IS or morphine administration on the potentiated CPP response.Results Prior IS significantly potentiated the CORT response to morphine. ADX significantly blocked the potentiated CPP to morphine produced by previous IS. However, CORT inhibition during IS had no effect on the IS potentiation of morphine CPP, whereas inhibition during morphine administration completely blocked this potentiation.Conclusions The results indicate that the CORT response to morphine is enhanced in rats that were previously exposed to an uncontrollable stressor, and that this response to the drug, not the stressor, is necessary for the stress-enhanced potentiation of morphine CPP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-004-2041-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 47

Authors
Der-Avakian, A., Will, M. J., Bland, S. T., Deak, T., Nguyen, K. T., Schmid, M. J., Spencer, R. L., Watkins, L. R., & Maier, S. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2004-11-17
Volume
179
Issue
2
Pages
409-417
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2102030231
Cited by
47
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K02DA015642, R01DA013159, DA 015642, DA16004, DA 13159, F32DA016004)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
glucocorticoids, morphine, conditioned place preference, uncontrollable stress, inescapable shock, adrenalectomy, metyrapone, aminoglutethimide, drug reward
MeSH terms
Adrenalectomy, Aminoglutethimide, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Operant, Electroshock, Glucocorticoids, Hormone Antagonists, Hydrocortisone, Male, Metyrapone, Morphine, Narcotics, Reinforcement, Psychology, Stress, Psychological, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review