Severity of nicotine dependence modulates cue-induced brain activity in regions involved in motor preparation and imagery
Abstract
Rationale In nicotine-dependent subjects, cues related to smoking elicit activity in brain regions linked to attention, memory, emotion and motivation. Cue-induced brain activation is associated with self-reported craving but further correlates are widely unknown.Objectives This study was conducted to investigate whether brain activity elicited by smoking cues increases with severity of nicotine dependence and intensity of cue-elicited craving.Methods Ten healthy male smokers whose degree of nicotine dependence ranged from absent to severe were investigated. Visual smoking cues and neutral stimuli were presented in a block design during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Using multiple linear regression analysis, the blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response to smoking cues was correlated with severity of nicotine dependence assessed with the Fagerström Test of Nicotine Dependence (FTND) and with cue-induced craving.Results Significant positive correlations between the BOLD activity and FTND scores were found in brain areas related to visuospatial attention (anterior cingulate cortex, parietal cortex, parahippocampal gyrus and cuneus) and in regions involved in motor preparation and imagery (primary and premotor cortex, supplementary motor area). Intensity of cue-induced craving was significantly associated with greater BOLD activation in mesocorticolimbic areas engaged in incentive motivation and in brain regions related to episodic memory.Conclusions Our study suggests that severity of nicotine dependence and intensity of craving are independently associated with cue-induced brain activation in separate neuronal networks. The observed association between severity of dependence and brain activity in regions involved in allocation of attention, motor preparation and imagery might reflect preparation of automated drug taking behavior thereby facilitating cue-induced relapse.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 230
- Authors
- Smolka, M. N., Bühler, M., Klein, S., Zimmermann, U., Mann, K., Heinz, A., & Braus, D. F.
- Affiliations
- Central Institute of Mental Health (DE)
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Smolka, Michael N.
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 2005-08-13
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 577-588
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- OpenAlex
- W2018086419
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- nicotine dependence, smoking cues, cue-induced craving, cue reactivity, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence, visuospatial attention, motor preparation, motor imagery, supplementary motor area, premotor cortex, mesocorticolimbic system, incentive motivation, episodic memory, relapse
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Arousal, Association Learning, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cues, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Imagination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Motivation, Nicotine, Oxygen, Psychomotor Performance, Smoking, Statistics as Topic, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Tobacco Use Disorder, Linear Models, Behavior, Addictive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review