Cited by 140Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorTraffic and Road SafetySubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The acute effects of d-amphetamine and methamphetamine on attention and psychomotor performance

Silber, Beata Y., Croft, Rodney J., Papafotiou, Katherine, Stough, Con·2006·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale It is not clear how the deleterious effects of amphetamines on driving performance are mediated in terms of select cognitive processes. Objectives The current three separate experiments assessed the acute effects of an oral dose of either 0.42-mg/kg d-amphetamine, d,l-methamphetamine and d-methamphetamine on driving-related cognitive functions in a total of 60 healthy non-fatigued adults. Materials and methods Three separate repeated measures counterbalanced, double-blind, placebo-controlled designs were employed in which 20 volunteers completed two treatment conditions, either d-amphetamine, d,l-methamphetamine or d-methamphetamine and placebo. Performance was assessed on a range of attentional, psychomotor and perceptual speed tasks. Results Mean blood concentrations at 120-, 170- and 240-min postdrug administration were 83, 98 and 96 ng/ml, respectively, for d-amphetamine, 90, 95 and 105 ng/ml, respectively, for d,l-methamphetamine and 72, 67 and 59 ng/ml, respectively, for d-methamphetamine. The amphetamines, in general, improved various aspects of attention (Digit Vigilance, Digit Symbol Substitution Test and Movement Estimation Performance) with some evidence to suggest possible enhancement in psychomotor functioning (Tracking ability) and perceptual speed (Inspection Time). Conclusions The current series of studies primarily provides evidence of low-level amphetamine-related enhancement of function; however, it also provides evidence of less conservative move…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-006-0410-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 63 · Cited by 140

Authors
Silber, B. Y., Croft, R. J., Papafotiou, K., & Stough, C.
Affiliations
Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Silber, Beata Y.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2006-06-08
Volume
187
Issue
2
Pages
154-169
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2068192355
Cited by
140
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 16
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
amphetamine, methamphetamine, d-amphetamine, driving performance, attention, psychomotor performance, perceptual speed, motion estimation, road safety, cognitive enhancement
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Attention, Automobile Driving, Dextroamphetamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Methamphetamine, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Stereoisomerism, Amphetamine-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review