Cited by 22Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudySmoking Behavior and CessationNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Cellular nicotinic receptor desensitization correlates with nicotine-induced acute behavioral tolerance in rats

Robinson, Susan E., Vann, Robert E., Britton, Angela F., O’Connell, Mary M., James, John R., Rosecrans, John A.·2007·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale Individuals vary in their susceptibility to nicotine addiction. However, there is little evidence that behavioral sensitivity to nicotine is dependent upon the functional state of nicotinic cholinergic receptors (nAChRs).Objective This study aims to determine the relationship between in vivo behavioral desensitization and in vitro desensitization of nAChR function.Methods Male Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate nicotine were tested for development of acute behavioral tolerance. The rats were injected with nicotine (0.4 mg/kg free base, s.c.), tested for nicotine discrimination for 2 min, then injected with the same dose of nicotine 90, 180, and 270 min after the first injection and tested for nicotine discrimination after each injection. Susceptibility of nAChRs of individual rats to desensitization was assessed by use of the (86)Rb(+) efflux assay using synaptosomes prepared from the "thalamus," which included the hypothalamus and midbrain as well as the thalamic nuclei. To desensitize nAChRs, synaptsosomes were superfused with low concentrations of nicotine (5, 10, 20, and 30 nM) before stimulation of (86)Rb(+) efflux with nicotine (10 muM).Results The slopes of the behavioral desensitization were plotted as a function of the decline of nicotine-stimulated (86)Rb(+) efflux after in vitro desensitization. A significant correlation was observed between the in vitro desensitization of thalamic (86)Rb(+) efflux and the extent of behavioral desensitization of individual rats.Conclusions These findings are consistent with the idea that production of acute behavioral tolerance by nicotine is related to its ability to induce nAChR desensitization at the cellular level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-006-0687-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 22

Authors
Robinson, S. E., Vann, R. E., Britton, A. F., O’Connell, M. M., James, J. R., & Rosecrans, J. A.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Robinson, Susan E.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2007-01-19
Volume
192
Issue
1
Pages
71-78
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2051158503
Cited by
22
References
41
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, receptor desensitization, nicotine tolerance, nicotine discrimination, 86Rb efflux
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Conditioning, Operant, Discrimination Learning, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Tolerance, Male, Nicotine, Receptors, Nicotinic, Rubidium Radioisotopes, Synaptosomes, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Nicotinic Agonists, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review