Enhanced methamphetamine self-administration in a neurodevelopmental rat model of schizophrenia
Open accessAbstract
Rationale Substance abuse is more prevalent among patients with schizophrenia than in the general population. The considerable overlap in neurobiological disruptions thought to underlie each condition suggests that addictive behavior may represent a primary symptom of schizophrenia.Objective This study investigated drug-seeking in a neurodevelopmental animal model of schizophrenia, the neonatal ventral hippocampal lesion (NVHL) model.Materials and methods At postnatal day 7, rats received an excitotoxic ventral hippocampus lesion or a sham procedure and were trained as adults to self-administer methamphetamine (0.1 mg/kg/infusion) or respond for natural reinforcement (water or food).Results NVHL rats were faster than shams to acquire the operant response for either drug self-administration or water reinforcement, suggesting that simple instrumental learning may be enhanced in these animals. NVHL and sham rats displayed no differences in fixed-ratio (FR) responding for either methamphetamine or food, and both groups of animals were equally sensitive to methamphetamine dose changes (0.05, 0.1, or 0.2 mg/kg/infusion). However, under a progressive-ratio (PR) schedule, NVHL animals reached significantly higher break points (NVHL 18 infusions; sham 12 infusions) for methamphetamine but not food reinforcement, suggesting enhanced motivation to acquire drug and/or elevated incentive value of the drug that did not generalize to another form of reinforcement.Conclusions These data indicate that developmental disruption of the hippocampus elevates rats' vulnerability to drug-seeking behavior under PR conditions. Furthermore, drug self-administration in the NVHL animal emulates addictive behavior in schizophrenia, making this model useful for investigating the mechanisms of dual diagnosis, including the neurobiological and behavioral similarities between addiction and schizophrenia.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adult rats with a NVHL show hyperlocomotion, increased response to novelty, abnormal social behaviors, exaggerated responses to stress, stimulants and NMDA antagonists, and increased liability for addictive behaviors.
“Behaviorally, adult rats with a NVHL show hyperlocomotion, 39,40 increased response to novelty, 41 abnormal social behaviors, 41 exaggerated responses to stress, stimulants and NMDA antagonists, 39,42 and increased liability for addictive behaviors.43,44”
From Adolescent Onset of Cortical Disinhibition in Schizophrenia: Insights From Animal Models (2011) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 43
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Saul RD, Wiest MK, Brady AM. Spatial working memory deficits in the neonatal ventral hippocampal lesion rat model of schizophrenia. Program No. 687.3, Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner, Society for Neuroscience; Washington DC. 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Authors
- Brady, A. M., McCallum, S. E., Glick, S. D., & O’Donnell, P.
- Affiliations
- Albany Medical College (US)
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brady, Anne Marie
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 2008-05-26
- Volume
- 200
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 205-215
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- PMC
- PMC2572197
- OpenAlex
- W2001826378
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA014020, DA14020)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- methamphetamine self-administration, schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental model, drug-seeking behavior, progressive ratio responding, incentive value, operant conditioning, dual diagnosis, addiction, excitotoxic lesions, ventral hippocampus
- MeSH terms
- Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Behavior, Animal, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Hippocampus, Male, Methamphetamine, Pregnancy, Reinforcement Schedule, Schizophrenia, Self Administration, Behavior, Addictive, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Amphetamine-Related Disorders, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review