Cited by 69Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatment

A prospective open-label study of aripiprazole in fragile X syndrome

Erickson, Craig A., Stigler, Kimberly A., Wink, Logan K., Mullett, Jennifer E., Kohn, Arlene, Posey, David J., McDougle, Christopher J.·2011·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common inherited form of developmental disability and most common single gene cause of autism. Persons with FXS frequently exhibit irritable behavior marked by aggression, self-injury, and severe tantrums. Despite frequent clinical use of atypical antipsychotic drugs to target this behavioral cluster, no systematic trials to date have assessed the efficacy and safety of these drugs in persons with FXS.Methods We conducted a prospective open-label 12-week trial of aripiprazole in 12 persons aged 6-25 years (mean age, 14.3 years) with FXS who were free of concomitant psychoactive drugs.Results Aripiprazole use (mean dose, 9.8 mg/day) was associated with treatment response (defined by a Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale score of much improved or very much improved and a ≥ 25% improvement on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability subscale) in 10 of 12 (87%) persons. Two individuals (13%) discontinued aripiprazole prior to study completion due to adverse events. One discontinuation was due to akathisia, mild drooling, and mild tiredness and the other due to moderate tiredness and moderate drooling. No significant changes in vital signs including weight or laboratory measures occurred during treatment with aripiprazole.Conclusions Aripiprazole was generally safe and well tolerated and was associated with significant improvement in irritable behavior. Given these findings, a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of aripiprazole in FXS is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-011-2194-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 69

Authors
Erickson, C. A., Stigler, K. A., Wink, L. K., Mullett, J. E., Kohn, A., Posey, D. J., & McDougle, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
  • Riley Hospital for Children (US)
Corresponding author
Erickson, Craig A.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2011-02-12
Volume
216
Issue
1
Pages
85-90
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2023509740
Cited by
69
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH077600, R01MH072964, R01MH083739, K23MH082119)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025761, KL2 UL1 RR025761)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
aripiprazole, fragile X syndrome, irritability, aggression, self-harm, tantrums, atypical antipsychotics, autism spectrum disorder, adverse events, akathisia, drug safety and tolerability
MeSH terms
Aripiprazole, Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Child, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Piperazines, Prospective Studies, Psychological Tests, Antipsychotic Agents, Quinolones, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review