A prospective open-label study of aripiprazole in fragile X syndrome
Abstract
Rationale Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common inherited form of developmental disability and most common single gene cause of autism. Persons with FXS frequently exhibit irritable behavior marked by aggression, self-injury, and severe tantrums. Despite frequent clinical use of atypical antipsychotic drugs to target this behavioral cluster, no systematic trials to date have assessed the efficacy and safety of these drugs in persons with FXS.Methods We conducted a prospective open-label 12-week trial of aripiprazole in 12 persons aged 6-25 years (mean age, 14.3 years) with FXS who were free of concomitant psychoactive drugs.Results Aripiprazole use (mean dose, 9.8 mg/day) was associated with treatment response (defined by a Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale score of much improved or very much improved and a ≥ 25% improvement on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability subscale) in 10 of 12 (87%) persons. Two individuals (13%) discontinued aripiprazole prior to study completion due to adverse events. One discontinuation was due to akathisia, mild drooling, and mild tiredness and the other due to moderate tiredness and moderate drooling. No significant changes in vital signs including weight or laboratory measures occurred during treatment with aripiprazole.Conclusions Aripiprazole was generally safe and well tolerated and was associated with significant improvement in irritable behavior. Given these findings, a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of aripiprazole in FXS is warranted.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Preliminary studies of aripiprazole in FXS have found evidence for an improvement in clinical symptoms and irritability.
“Preliminary studies of aripiprazole in FXS have also found evidence for an improvement in clinical symptoms and irritability [732,733].”
From Reward circuitry dysfunction in psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders and genetic syndromes: animal models and clinical findings (2012) · cites this paper as [733]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Erickson, C. A., Stigler, K. A., Wink, L. K., Mullett, J. E., Kohn, A., Posey, D. J., & McDougle, C. J.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
- Riley Hospital for Children (US)
- Corresponding author
- Erickson, Craig A.
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 2011-02-12
- Volume
- 216
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-90
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- OpenAlex
- W2023509740
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH077600, R01MH072964, R01MH083739, K23MH082119)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025761, KL2 UL1 RR025761)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- aripiprazole, fragile X syndrome, irritability, aggression, self-harm, tantrums, atypical antipsychotics, autism spectrum disorder, adverse events, akathisia, drug safety and tolerability
- MeSH terms
- Aripiprazole, Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Child, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Piperazines, Prospective Studies, Psychological Tests, Antipsychotic Agents, Quinolones, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review