NMDA receptor antagonism: escalation of aggressive behavior in alcohol-drinking mice
Open accessAbstract
Rationale Memantine is a potential treatment for alcoholic patients, yet few studies investigate the effect of concurrent treatment with memantine and ethanol on aggression. We evaluated aggressive behavior following ethanol consumption and treatment with glutamatergic drugs to characterize interactions between these compounds. Objective This study aimed to use rodent models of aggression to examine interactions between glutamatergic compounds and ethanol. Materials and methods Once male CFW mice reliably self-administered 1 g/kg ethanol or water, they were assessed for aggression in resident-intruder confrontations. Alternatively, aggression was evaluated following a social-instigation procedure. Animals were then injected with memantine, ketamine, neramexane, MTEP, or LY379268 before aggressive confrontations. Effects of the pharmacological manipulations on salient aggressive and non-aggressive behaviors were analyzed. Results Moderate doses of memantine, neramexane, and MTEP interacted with ethanol to increase the frequency of attack bites while ketamine did not. The highest dose of LY379268, an mGluR(2/3) agonist, reduced both aggressive and non-aggressive behaviors after water and ethanol self-administration. Attack bites increased with social instigation and decreased with administration of high doses of MTEP and LY379268. Memantine and MTEP both reduced attack bite frequency in the instigation condition without reducing locomotor behavior. Conclusions Memantine and neramexane interacted with ethanol to heighten aggression. The binding characteristics of these compounds allow for 'partial trapping' by which some NMDARs are unblocked between depolarizations. We propose that this feature may contribute to the differential aggression-heightening interactions between these compounds and ethanol. MTEP also interacted with ethanol to escalate aggression, possibly through inhibition of mGluR(5) modulation of NMDARs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Mice with Reduced NMDA Receptor Expression Display Behaviors Related to Schizophrenia
Mohn, A. R., Gainetdinov, R. R., Caron, M. G., & Koller, B. H. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81972-8 · Cited by 1,075 · see citing works
Gogos, J. A., Morgan, M., Luine, V., Santha, M., Ogawa, S., Pfaff, D., & Karayiorgou, M. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.17.9991 · Cited by 864 · see citing works
Melis, M., Camarini, R., Ungless, M. A., & Bonci, A. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-06-02074.2002 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The neurobiological basis of human aggression: A review on genetic and epigenetic mechanisms
Waltes, R., Chiocchetti, A. G., & Freitag, C. M. (2016) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.32388 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Hwa, L., Besheer, J., & Kash, T. (2017) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.9609.1 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Russell, N. M., Frier, M. D., Bortolato, M., & Mangieri, R. A. (2026) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-025-06938-0 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Newman, E. L., Chu, A., Bahamón, B., Takahashi, A., DeBold, J. F., & Miczek, K. A.
- Affiliations
- Tufts University (US)
- National Institute of Genetics (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Miczek, Klaus A.
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 2012-05-16
- Volume
- 224
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 167-177
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- PMC
- PMC3694321
- OpenAlex
- W2045847598
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23683021)
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA013983, AA013983)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- NMDA receptor antagonism, aggression, ethanol, memantine, MTEP, LY379268, ketamine, mGluR2/3 agonist, mGluR5, resident-intruder aggression, drug-drug interactions, glutamatergic drugs, alcoholism treatment
- MeSH terms
- Aggression, Alcohol Drinking, Ethanol, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Interactions, Female, Male, Motor Activity, Self Administration, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review