Cited by 87Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Emotional valence and context of social influences on drug abuse-related behavior in animal models of social stress and prosocial interaction

Open access
Neisewander, J. L., Peartree, N. A., Pentkowski, N. S.·2012·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale Social factors are important determinants of drug dependence and relapse.Objectives We reviewed pre-clinical literature examining the role of social experiences from early life through the development of drug dependence and relapse, emphasizing two aspects of these experiences: (1) whether the social interaction is appetitive or aversive and (2) whether the social interaction occurs within or outside of the drug-taking context.Methods The models reviewed include neonatal care, isolation, social defeat, chronic subordination, and prosocial interactions. We review results from these models in regard to effects on self-administration and conditioned place preference established with alcohol, psychostimulants, and opiates.Results We suggest that in general, when the interactions occur outside of the drug-taking context, prosocial interactions are protective against drug abuse-related behaviors, whereas social stressors facilitate these behaviors. By contrast, positive or negative social interactions occurring within the drug-taking context may interact with other risk factors to enhance or inhibit these behaviors.Conclusions Despite differences in the nature and complexity of human social behavior compared to other species, the evolving animal literature provides useful models for understanding social influences on drug abuse-related behavior that will allow for research on the behavioral and biological mechanisms involved. The models have contributed to understanding social influences on initiation and maintenance of drug use, but more research is needed to understand social influences on drug relapse.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-012-2853-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A wide variety of animal models show that sociality lowers self-administration of drugs such as cocaine, ethanol and opiates, and fruit flies prefer healthy foods over alcohol after social sexual interactions.

    “A wide variety of animal models have been studied to show that sociality lowers self-administration of drugs such as cocaine, ethanol and opiates [73], and even fruit flies have been found to prefer healthy foods over alcohol after social sexual interactions [74].”

    From The social origins of consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [73]

    The Introduction and the section on isolation versus social housing outside the drug context report protective effects of positive social interactions, including reduced propensity to self-administer ethanol and opiates and reduced cocaine seeking. But the paper does not establish that sociality generally lowers self-administration of all three drugs: it also reports increased cocaine and ethanol intake in some social settings. The fruit-fly statement is attached to a different citation [74], so it is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 271 · Cited by 87

Authors
Neisewander, J. L., Peartree, N. A., & Pentkowski, N. S.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Neisewander, J. L.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2012-09-07
Volume
224
Issue
1
Pages
33-56
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2057781666
Cited by
87
References
271
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (F32DA025413, R21DA023123, R01DA011064)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
social stress, prosocial interaction, drug abuse, relapse, drug addiction, social defeat, isolation, neonatal care, self-administration, conditioned place preference, alcohol, psychostimulants, opiates, animal models
MeSH terms
Animals, Conditioning, Operant, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Recurrence, Self Administration, Social Behavior, Species Specificity, Stress, Psychological, Behavior, Addictive, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review