Cigarette craving and withdrawal symptoms during temporary abstinence and the effect of nicotine gum
Abstract
Rationale It is widely believed that nicotine withdrawal symptoms appear within a few hours of stopping smoking, but few data exist documenting their emergence in naturalistic settings. In several countries, nicotine replacement products are licensed for relief of withdrawal symptoms during temporary abstinence, but again, there are no data supporting this from naturalistic settings. Objectives To examine the emergence of cigarette craving and withdrawal symptoms during temporary abstinence in a naturalistic setting while using either nicotine or placebo gum. Methods Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study in which 132 dependent smokers abstained for 6 h with the assistance of either nicotine (2 mg, n = 42 or 4 mg, n = 24) or placebo (n = 66) gum while travelling on a non-smoking train. Outcome measures were ratings of craving and mood withdrawal symptoms prior to treatment and at regular intervals during abstinence. Results In a multivariate analysis of all symptoms, there was no interaction between treatment and time [F(21,110) = 1.28, p = 0.20, η²(p)= 0.20] nor an effect of treatment [F(7,124) = 0.45, p = 0.87, η²(p)= 0.03]. There was an effect of time [F(21,110) = 11.59, p Conclusions Smokers who temporarily abstain in naturalistic settings experience craving and withdrawal symptoms that emerge linearly over the first 6 h of abstinence. Changes in craving and several mood withdrawal symptoms can be detected within the first 3 h. Nicotine gum may not have an acu…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Relatively few studies have utilized rapid sampling procedures to precisely model the time course of these constructs.
“yet relatively few studies have utilized rapid sampling procedures to precisely model the time course of these constructs (Brown et al., 2013; Hendricks, Ditre, Drobes, & Brandon, 2006).”
From Modeling naturalistic craving, withdrawal, and affect during early nicotine abstinence: A pilot ecological momentary assessment study. (2015) · cites this paper as Brown et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Brown, J., Hajek, P., McRobbie, H., Locker, J., Gillison, F., McEwen, A., Beard, E., & West, R.
- Affiliations
- Cancer Research UK (GB)
- University of London (GB)
- University of Bath (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Brown, Jamie
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 2013-05-02
- Volume
- 229
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 209-218
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- OpenAlex
- W1992838819
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancer Research UK (14135)
- Medical Research Council (MR/K023195/1)
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007489/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Keywords
- cigarette craving, nicotine withdrawal symptoms, nicotine gum, nicotine replacement therapy, smoking cessation, naturalistic settings
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nicotine, Smoking, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Time Factors, Smoking Cessation, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Tobacco Use Cessation Devices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review