Cited by 28Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Cigarette craving and withdrawal symptoms during temporary abstinence and the effect of nicotine gum

Brown, Jamie, Hajek, Peter, McRobbie, Hayden, Locker, Jo, Gillison, Fiona, McEwen, Andy, Beard, Emma, West, Robert·2013·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale It is widely believed that nicotine withdrawal symptoms appear within a few hours of stopping smoking, but few data exist documenting their emergence in naturalistic settings. In several countries, nicotine replacement products are licensed for relief of withdrawal symptoms during temporary abstinence, but again, there are no data supporting this from naturalistic settings. Objectives To examine the emergence of cigarette craving and withdrawal symptoms during temporary abstinence in a naturalistic setting while using either nicotine or placebo gum. Methods Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study in which 132 dependent smokers abstained for 6 h with the assistance of either nicotine (2 mg, n = 42 or 4 mg, n = 24) or placebo (n = 66) gum while travelling on a non-smoking train. Outcome measures were ratings of craving and mood withdrawal symptoms prior to treatment and at regular intervals during abstinence. Results In a multivariate analysis of all symptoms, there was no interaction between treatment and time [F(21,110) = 1.28, p = 0.20, η²(p)= 0.20] nor an effect of treatment [F(7,124) = 0.45, p = 0.87, η²(p)= 0.03]. There was an effect of time [F(21,110) = 11.59, p Conclusions Smokers who temporarily abstain in naturalistic settings experience craving and withdrawal symptoms that emerge linearly over the first 6 h of abstinence. Changes in craving and several mood withdrawal symptoms can be detected within the first 3 h. Nicotine gum may not have an acu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-013-3100-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 28

Authors
Brown, J., Hajek, P., McRobbie, H., Locker, J., Gillison, F., McEwen, A., Beard, E., & West, R.
Affiliations
  • Cancer Research UK (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
  • University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Brown, Jamie
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2013-05-02
Volume
229
Issue
1
Pages
209-218
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W1992838819
Cited by
28
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (14135)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K023195/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007489/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
cigarette craving, nicotine withdrawal symptoms, nicotine gum, nicotine replacement therapy, smoking cessation, naturalistic settings
MeSH terms
Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nicotine, Smoking, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Time Factors, Smoking Cessation, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Tobacco Use Cessation Devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review