Acute effects of ayahuasca on neuropsychological performance: differences in executive function between experienced and occasional users
Abstract
Background Ayahuasca, a South American psychotropic plant tea containing the psychedelic 5-HT2A receptor agonist N,N-dimethyltryptamine, has been shown to increase regional cerebral blood flow in prefrontal brain regions after acute administration to humans. Despite interactions at this level, neuropsychological studies have not found cognitive deficits in abstinent long-term users.Objectives Here, we wished to investigate the effects of acute ayahuasca intake on neuropsychological performance, specifically on working memory and executive function.Methods Twenty-four ayahuasca users (11 long-term experienced users and 13 occasional users) were assessed in their habitual setting using the Stroop, Sternberg, and Tower of London tasks prior to and following ayahuasca intake.Results Errors in the Sternberg task increased, whereas reaction times in the Stroop task decreased and accuracy was maintained for the whole sample following ayahuasca intake. Interestingly, results in the Tower of London showed significantly increased execution and resolution times and number of movements for the occasional but not the experienced users. Additionally, a correlation analysis including all subjects showed that impaired performance in the Tower of London was inversely correlated with lifetime ayahuasca use.Conclusions Acute ayahuasca administration impaired working memory but decreased stimulus-response interference. Interestingly, detrimental effects on higher cognition were only observed in the less experienced group. Rather than leading to increased impairment, greater prior exposure to ayahuasca was associated with reduced incapacitation. Compensatory or neuromodulatory effects associated with long-term ayahuasca intake could underlie preserved executive function in experienced users.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ayahuasca improves neuropsychological functions.
“improved neuropsychological functions (Bouso et al., 2012, 2015; Bouso et al., 2013)”
From Psychological variables implied in the therapeutic effect of ayahuasca: A contextual approach (2018) · cites this paper as Bouso et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 76 · Cited by 96
- Authors
- Bouso, J. C., Fábregas, J. M., Antonijoan, R. M., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., & Riba, J.
- Affiliations
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (ES)
- ORCID
- Bouso, José Carlos
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 2013-06-21
- Volume
- 230
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 415-424
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- OpenAlex
- W2090188780
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 4.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Plan Nacional sobre Drogas
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Keywords
- ayahuasca, acute drug effects, executive function, working memory, DMT, 5-HT2A receptor agonists, Tower of London, Stroop task, Sternberg task, cognitive impairment, neuromodulation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cognition, Female, Hallucinogens, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Tea, Time Factors, Banisteriopsis, Drug Users, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review