Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: discounting of monetary and consumable outcomes in current and non-smokers
Open accessAbstract
RATIONALE: In delay discounting, temporally remote rewards have less value. Cigarette smoking is associated with steeper discounting of delayed money. The generality of this to nonmonetary outcomes, however, is unknown. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether cigarette smokers also show steep discounting of other delayed outcomes. METHODS: Sixty-five participants (32 smokers and 33 non-smokers) completed four delay-discounting tasks, each involving different hypothetical outcomes. In the monetary task, participants indicated their preference for a smaller amount of money available immediately (titrated across trials) and $100 awarded at delays ranging from 1 week to 25 years (tested in blocks). In the three other discounting tasks the larger-later reward was $100 worth of a favorite food, alcoholic drink, or a favorite form of entertainment. All other aspects of these discounting tasks were identical to the monetary discounting task. RESULTS: As previously shown, smokers discounted delayed money more steeply than non-smokers did. In addition, smokers discounted delayed food and entertainment rewards more steeply than did nonsmokers. A person's discounting of one outcome was correlated with discounting of other outcomes. Non-smokers discounted money less steeply than all other outcomes; smokers discounted money significantly less than food. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to nonsmokers, cigarette smokers more steeply discount several types of delayed outcomes. This result, together with the finding that cross-commodity discounting rates were correlated within subjects, suggests that delay discounting is a trait that extends across domains.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Discounting rates vary across commodities, but people who steeply discount one commodity tend also to steeply discount another.
“although discounting rates varied across commodities (e.g., steeper discounting of delayed food relative to delayed money), those who steeply discounted one commodity tended also to steeply discount the other one”
From Changing Delay Discounting and Impulsive Choice: Implications for Addictions, Prevention, and Human Health (2019) · cites this paper as Friedel et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 86
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Steinberg ML Williams JM Ziedonis DM Financial implications of cigarette smoking among individuals with schizophrenia Tob Control 2004 13 206 15175544 PMC1747846
- Authors
- Friedel, J. E., DeHart, W. B., Madden, G. J., & Odum, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Utah State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Odum, Amy L.
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 2014-05-13
- Volume
- 231
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 4517-4526
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- PMC
- PMC4221621
- OpenAlex
- W2140477846
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA029100, RO1DA029100)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- delay discounting, cigarette smoking, impulsivity, food reward, delay of gratification, smokers versus non-smokers, trait impulsivity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Reward, Smoking, Social Control, Informal, Tobacco Use Disorder, Delay Discounting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review