Cited by 86Smoking Behavior and CessationDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: discounting of monetary and consumable outcomes in current and non-smokers

Open access
Friedel, Jonathan E., DeHart, William B., Madden, Gregory J., Odum, Amy L.·2014·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

RATIONALE: In delay discounting, temporally remote rewards have less value. Cigarette smoking is associated with steeper discounting of delayed money. The generality of this to nonmonetary outcomes, however, is unknown. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether cigarette smokers also show steep discounting of other delayed outcomes. METHODS: Sixty-five participants (32 smokers and 33 non-smokers) completed four delay-discounting tasks, each involving different hypothetical outcomes. In the monetary task, participants indicated their preference for a smaller amount of money available immediately (titrated across trials) and $100 awarded at delays ranging from 1 week to 25 years (tested in blocks). In the three other discounting tasks the larger-later reward was $100 worth of a favorite food, alcoholic drink, or a favorite form of entertainment. All other aspects of these discounting tasks were identical to the monetary discounting task. RESULTS: As previously shown, smokers discounted delayed money more steeply than non-smokers did. In addition, smokers discounted delayed food and entertainment rewards more steeply than did nonsmokers. A person's discounting of one outcome was correlated with discounting of other outcomes. Non-smokers discounted money less steeply than all other outcomes; smokers discounted money significantly less than food. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to nonsmokers, cigarette smokers more steeply discount several types of delayed outcomes. This result, together with the finding that cross-commodity discounting rates were correlated within subjects, suggests that delay discounting is a trait that extends across domains.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-014-3597-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 86

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Steinberg ML Williams JM Ziedonis DM Financial implications of cigarette smoking among individuals with schizophrenia Tob Control 2004 13 206 15175544 PMC1747846

Authors
Friedel, J. E., DeHart, W. B., Madden, G. J., & Odum, A. L.
Affiliations
Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Odum, Amy L.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2014-05-13
Volume
231
Issue
23
Pages
4517-4526
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2140477846
Cited by
86
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 2
FWCI
7.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA029100, RO1DA029100)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
delay discounting, cigarette smoking, impulsivity, food reward, delay of gratification, smokers versus non-smokers, trait impulsivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Reward, Smoking, Social Control, Informal, Tobacco Use Disorder, Delay Discounting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review