Modafinil enhances alerting-related brain activity in attention networks
Abstract
Rationale Modafinil is a wake-promoting agent and has been reported to be effective in improving attention in patients with attentional disturbance. However, neural substrates underlying the modafinil effects on attention are not fully understood.Objectives We employed a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study with the attention network test (ANT) task in healthy adults and examined which networks of attention are mainly affected by modafinil and which neural substrates are responsible for the drug effects.Methods We used a randomized placebo-controlled within-subjects cross-over design. Twenty-three healthy adults participated in two series of an fMRI study, taking either a placebo or modafinil. The participants performed the ANT task, which is designed to measure three distinct attentional networks, alerting, orienting, and executive control, during the fMRI scanning. The effects of modafinil on behavioral performance and regional brain activity were analyzed.Results We found that modafinil enhanced alerting performance and showed greater alerting network activity in the left middle and inferior occipital gyri as compared with the placebo. The brain activations in the occipital regions were positively correlated with alerting performance.Conclusions Modafinil enhanced alerting performance and increased activation in the occipital lobe in the alerting network possibly relevant to noradrenergic activity during the ANT task. The present study may provide a rationale for the treatment of patients with distinct symptoms of impaired attention.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Modafinil can improve both sustained and selective attention in healthy subjects.
“It can improve both sustained and selective attention in healthy subjects116,117”
From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [117]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Ikeda, Y., Funayama, T., Tateno, A., Fukayama, H., Okubo, Y., & Suzuki, H.
- Affiliations
- Nippon Medical School (JP)
- Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Suzuki, Hidenori
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 2017-04-03
- Volume
- 234
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2077-2089
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- OpenAlex
- W2605030666
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology-Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities (S0801035)
- Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24791237)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Keywords
- modafinil, alerting, attentional networks, Attention Network Test, occipital cortex, noradrenergic activity, wake-promoting drugs, attention deficits, executive function, orienting
- MeSH terms
- Modafinil, Adult, Attention, Benzhydryl Compounds, Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Orientation, Cross-Over Studies, Executive Function, Wakefulness-Promoting Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review