CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of the abuse liability of three menthol Vuse Solo electronic cigarettes relative to combustible cigarettes and nicotine gum

Stiles, Mitchell F., Campbell, Leanne R., Jin, Tao, Graff, Donald W., Fant, Reginald V., Henningfield, Jack E.·2018·Psychopharmacology
DOI 10.1007/s00213-018-4904-xPMC PMC6015619
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-018-4904-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Mean ratings for the urge to smoke question “How strong is your current urge to smoke your usual brand cigarette?”
Fig. 1 Mean ratings for the urge to smoke question “How strong is your current urge to smoke your usual brand cigarette?”CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Mean plasma nicotine concentration profiles
Fig. 2 Mean plasma nicotine concentration profilesCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Abrams DB (2014) Promise and peril of e-cigarettes: can disruptive technology make cigarettes obsolete? JAMA 311(2):135–136. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.285347 · DOI
  2. Abrams DB, Glasser AM, Pearson JL, Villanti AC, Collins LK, Niaura RS (2017) Harm minimization and tobacco control: reframing societal views of nicotine use to rapidly save lives. Ann Rev Public Health In press · DOI
  3. Ahijevych K, Garrett BE (2004) Menthol pharmacology and its potential impact on cigarette smoking behavior. Nicotine Tob Res 6(Suppl 1):S17–S28 · DOI
  4. Baweja R, Curci KM, Yingst J, Veldheer S, Hrabovsky S, Wilson SJ, Nichols TT, Eissenberg T, Foulds J (2016) Views of experienced electronic cigarette users. Addict Res Theory 24(1):80–88 · DOI
  5. Benowitz NL, Dains KM, Dempsey D, Wilson M, Jacob P (2011) Racial differences in the relationship between number of cigarettes smoked and nicotine and carcinogen exposure. Nicotine Tob Res 13(9):772–783 · DOI
  6. Biener L, Hargraves JL (2015) A longitudinal study of electronic cigarette use among a population-based sample of adult smokers: association with smoking cessation and motivation to quit. Nicotine Tob Res 17(2):127–133 · DOI
  7. Carter LP, Stitzer ML, Henningfield JE, O’Connor RJ, Cummings KM, Hatsukami DK (2009) Abuse liability assessment of tobacco products including potential reduced exposure products. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 18:3241–3262. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0948 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Etter JF, Bullen C (2011) Electronic cigarette: users profile, utilization, satisfaction and perceived efficacy. Addiction 106:2017–2028 · DOI
  9. Fagerström K, Eissenberg T (2012) Dependence on tobacco and nicotine products: a case for product-specific assessment. Nicotine Tob Res 14(11):1382–1390. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nts007 · DOI
  10. Goniewicz ML, Knysak J, Gawron M, Kosmider L, Sobczak A, Kurek J, Prokopowicz A, Jablonska-Czapla M, Rosik-Dulewska C, Havel C, Jacob P 3rd, Benowitz N (2014) Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tob Control 23(2):133–139 · DOI
  11. Gottlieb S, Zeller M (2017) A nicotine-focused framework for public health. N Engl J Med 377(12):1111–1114. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1707409 · DOI
  12. Harrell PT, Marquinez NS, Correa JB, Meltzer LR, Unrod M, Sutton SK, Simmons VN, Brandon TH (2015) Expectancies for cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and nicotine replacement therapies among e-cigarette users (aka vapers). Nicotine Tob Res 17(2):193–200 · DOI
  13. Hatsukami DK (2013) Ending tobacco-caused mortality and morbidity: the case for performance standards for tobacco products. Tob Control 22(Supple 1):i36–i37. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050785 · DOI
  14. Henningfield JE (2015) Pharmacokinetic and dynamic factors in abuse potential: historical perspectives from research on opioids, stimulants and nicotine. Presented in Symposium X: the interplay of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in abuse potential: modeling madness? College on Problems of Drug Dependence Annual Meeting. Arizona Biltmore, Phoenix, June 13–18.
  15. Henningfield JE, Hatsukami DK, Zeller M, Peters E (2011) Conference on abuse liability and appeal of tobacco products: conclusions and recommendations. Drug Alcohol Depend 116(1–3):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.12.009 · DOI
  16. Lawrence D, Cadman B, Hoffman AC (2011) Sensory properties of menthol and smoking topography. Tob Induc Dis 9(Suppl 1):S3 · DOI
  17. McColl S, Sellers EM (2006) Research design strategies to evaluate the impact of formulations on abuse liability. Drug Alcohol Depend 83S:S52–S62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.01.015 · DOI
  18. Shiffman S, Paty JA, Gnys M, Kassel JA, Hickcox M (1996) First lapses to smoking: within-subjects analysis of real-time reports. J Consult Clin Psychol 64(2):366–379 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Shiffman S, Cone EJ, Buchhalter AR, Henningfield JE, Rohay JM, Gitchell JG, Pinney JM, Chau T (2009) Rapid absorption of nicotine from new nicotine gum formulations. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 91:380–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2008.08.012 · DOI
  20. Shihadeh A, Eissenberg T (2015) Electronic cigarette effectiveness and abuse liability: predicting and regulating nicotine flux. Nicotine Tob Res 17(2):158–162 · DOI
  21. Stiles MF, Campbell LR, Graff DW, Jones BA, Fant RV, Henningfield JE (2017) Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of electronic cigarettes, combustible cigarettes, and nicotine gum: implications for abuse liability. Psychopharmacol (Berl) doi 234:2643–2655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-17-4665-y · DOI · Paper page
  22. Tucker MR, Laugesesn M, Bullen C, Grace RC (2017) Predicting short-term uptake of electronic cigarettes: effects of nicotine, subjective effects and simulated demand. Nicotine Tob Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntx269 · DOI
  23. Vansickel AR, Weaver MF, Eissenberg T (2012) Clinical laboratory assessment of the abuse liability of an electronic cigarette. Addiction 107:1493–1500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0043.2012.03791.x · DOI
  24. Warner KE, Slade J, Sweanor DT (1997) The emerging market for long-term nicotine maintenance. JAMA 278(13):1087 · DOI
  25. Wickham RJ (2015) How menthol alters tobacco-smoking behavior: a biological perspective. Yale J Biol Med 88(3):279–287
  26. Zeller M (2013) Reflections on the ‘endgame’ for tobacco control. Tob Control 22:i40–i41. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050789 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Stiles, M. F., Campbell, L. R., Jin, T., Graff, D. W., Fant, R. V., & Henningfield, J. E.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-05-03
Volume
235
Issue
7
Pages
2077-2086
ISSN
  • 0033-3158
  • 1432-2072
DOI
10.1007/s00213-018-4904-x
PMC
PMC6015619
Cited by
32
References
1
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (tdm)
Funders
RJ Reynolds Vapor Company through its affiliate RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review