Is cannabis a risk factor for suicide attempts in men and women with psychotic illness?
Abstract
Objective To investigate whether recent cannabis use by men and women with psychotic disorders was associated with increased risk of suicide attempt, and to determine associated factors, stratified by sex. Methods Data from 1065 men and 725 women interviewed in the Australian national survey of psychosis were analysed to model separately, for each sex, the impact of daily, casual or no past-year cannabis use and other risk factors including age, on a past-year suicide attempt. Results In the past year, 168 (9.4%) participants attempted suicide. Unadjusted analyses showed daily cannabis users of both sexes had significantly increased odds of attempting suicide compared to non-users. After adjusting for confounding factors, this relationship was no longer significant. Depression had the strongest association with attempting suicide for both sexes. Sex differences in other risk factors were observed. In post hoc analysis, daily cannabis use was associated with higher odds of attempting suicide in older men compared to non-users; this was not found in younger men or women. Conclusions Associations between past-year cannabis use and suicide attempts were confounded by other factors (depression, loneliness, homelessness and hallucinations). The possibility of greater risk of suicidal behaviour with regular cannabis use for older men should be considered.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A higher risk of suicidal behaviors has been reported in men with psychotic disorders who use cannabis.
“and in men with psychotic disorders who use cannabis 133 .”
From Substance use disorders: a comprehensive update of classification, epidemiology, neurobiology, clinical aspects, treatment and prevention (2023) · cites this paper as [133]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 70 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Waterreus, A., Di Prinzio, P., Badcock, J. C., Martin-Iverson, M., Jablensky, A., & Morgan, V. A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Waterreus, A.
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 2018-05-16
- Volume
- 235
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2275-2285
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- OpenAlex
- W2803859778
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- cannabis use, suicide attempts, psychosis, schizophrenia, sex differences, depression, loneliness, homelessness, hallucinations, daily cannabis use, older men, confounding factors
- MeSH terms
- Marijuana Use, Adolescent, Adult, Australia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sex Characteristics, Suicide, Attempted, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review