Cited by 23Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatment

Is cannabis a risk factor for suicide attempts in men and women with psychotic illness?

Waterreus, A., Di Prinzio, P., Badcock, J. C., Martin-Iverson, M., Jablensky, A., Morgan, V. A.·2018·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Objective To investigate whether recent cannabis use by men and women with psychotic disorders was associated with increased risk of suicide attempt, and to determine associated factors, stratified by sex. Methods Data from 1065 men and 725 women interviewed in the Australian national survey of psychosis were analysed to model separately, for each sex, the impact of daily, casual or no past-year cannabis use and other risk factors including age, on a past-year suicide attempt. Results In the past year, 168 (9.4%) participants attempted suicide. Unadjusted analyses showed daily cannabis users of both sexes had significantly increased odds of attempting suicide compared to non-users. After adjusting for confounding factors, this relationship was no longer significant. Depression had the strongest association with attempting suicide for both sexes. Sex differences in other risk factors were observed. In post hoc analysis, daily cannabis use was associated with higher odds of attempting suicide in older men compared to non-users; this was not found in younger men or women. Conclusions Associations between past-year cannabis use and suicide attempts were confounded by other factors (depression, loneliness, homelessness and hallucinations). The possibility of greater risk of suicidal behaviour with regular cannabis use for older men should be considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-018-4924-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 70 · Cited by 23

Authors
Waterreus, A., Di Prinzio, P., Badcock, J. C., Martin-Iverson, M., Jablensky, A., & Morgan, V. A.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Waterreus, A.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2018-05-16
Volume
235
Issue
8
Pages
2275-2285
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2803859778
Cited by
23
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
cannabis use, suicide attempts, psychosis, schizophrenia, sex differences, depression, loneliness, homelessness, hallucinations, daily cannabis use, older men, confounding factors
MeSH terms
Marijuana Use, Adolescent, Adult, Australia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sex Characteristics, Suicide, Attempted, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review