Cited by 23Gut microbiota and healthCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesBrain Metastases and Treatment

Whole brain radiotherapy induces cognitive dysfunction in mice: key role of gut microbiota

Luo, Xiao-Xiao, Yang, Chun, Zhan, Gao-Feng, Li, Shan, Hua, Dong-Yu, Luo, Ai-Lin, Yuan, Xiang-Lin·2020·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale Approximately 20-40% of patients with cancer will experience brain metastasis (BM), which has a great impact on the quality of life and survival rates of patients. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is an effective method for the treatment of BM. However, it cannot be ignored that WBRT might induce a series of neuropsychiatric side effects, including cognitive dysfunction (CD). Accumulating evidence shows that the gut microbiota and the gut-microbiota-brain axis may play a vital role in the pathogenesis of CD.Objective and methods We adopted WBRT to mimic CD after a hierarchical cluster analysis of the Morris water maze test (MWMT) results. In addition, we observed the effects of antibiotics and prebiotics on WBRT-induced CD. Variations were revealed via the 16S rRNA sequencing analysis at different levels.Results The 16S rRNA sequencing analysis revealed an altered composition of gut microbiota between CD and non-CD phenotypes. Furthermore, we observed a decrease in the levels of Phylum-Bacteroidete, Class-Bacteroidia, and Order-Bacteroidales in the CD group and an increase in the Genus-Allobaculum level after WBRT. Pretreatment with antibiotics caused a significant decrease in the level of Phylum-TM7 01, whereas an increase in the levels of Class-Gammaproteobacteria, Order-Enterobacteriales, and Species-Escherichia coli. After pretreatment with probiotics, the levels of Phylum-Cyanobacteria, Class-4C0d-2, and Order-YS2 were decreased, while the levels of Family-Bacteroidaceae, Genus-Bacteroides, and Species-Parabacteroides distasonis were increased.Conclusions WBRT-induced CD might be highly related to abnormal composition of gut microbiota. Strategies improving the composition of the gut microbiota may provide beneficial effects on CD in individuals exposed to WBRT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-020-05520-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 23

Authors
Luo, X.-X., Yang, C., Zhan, G.-F., Li, S., Hua, D.-Y., Luo, A.-L., & Yuan, X.-L.
Affiliations
  • Jiangsu Province Hospital (CN)
  • Tongji Hospital (CN)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2020-06-03
Volume
237
Issue
7
Pages
2089-2101
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W3032632118
Cited by
23
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Brain Metastases and Treatment
Keywords
whole brain radiotherapy, cognitive impairment, gut microbiota, gut-brain axis, brain metastases, antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, Bacteroidetes, Allobaculum, Escherichia coli, Parabacteroides distasonis, neuropsychiatric adverse effects
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Brain, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Maze Learning, Probiotics, Mice, Prebiotics, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review