Cited by 227Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Effect of naltrexone on subjective alcohol response in subjects at high and low risk for future alcohol dependence

King, Andrea C., Volpicelli, Joseph R., Frazer, A., O'Brien, Charles P.·1997·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

We investigated specific subjective effects of naltrexone pretreatment or placebo during various intervals on the breath alcohol level (BAL) curve in nonalcoholic volunteers. Fifteen high-risk (social drinkers with an alcoholic father) and 14 low-risk (no alcoholic relatives in at least two generations) subjects were tested in a double-blind placebo-controlled study of the effects of 50 mg oral naltrexone on response to a moderate dose of alcohol. Dependent measures included subjective stimulation and sedation subscales from the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) and mood subscales from the Profile of Mood States (POMS). At rising BALs, high-risk subjects showed a naltrexone-related attenuation of BAES stimulation. This effect was not evident in low-risk subjects, who directionally showed the opposite effect, although nonsignificant. For both groups, there were no significant naltrexone-related effects for BAES sedation; however, naltrexone did affect several POMS scales on alcohol response, such as decreased vigor, and increased fatigue, tension, and confusion. Confusion was significantly elevated for the high-risk group during rising BALs of the naltrexone session. The results suggest a differential response to naltrexone, based on paternal history of alcoholism and level of stimulation experienced during alcohol drinking.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s002130050156

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Altering euphoric and pleasurable effects of alcohol is hypothesized to underlie in part the efficacy of opioid receptor antagonists, including naltrexone and nalmefene.

    “The findings may have relevance to medication development, as altering euphoric and pleasurable effects of alcohol would be important targets for novel treatments and are hypothesized to underlie in part the efficacy of opioid receptor antagonists, including naltrexone and nalmefene(67–76).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 227

Authors
King, A. C., Volpicelli, J. R., Frazer, A., & O'Brien, C. P.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
1997-01-13
Volume
129
Issue
1
Pages
15-22
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2135057136
Cited by
227
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (T32- 0A 7241)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R0I-AA0 7517)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P50-DA-05186, P50DA005186)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
naltrexone, alcohol dependence risk, paternal alcoholism, Profile of Mood States, mood
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Ethanol, Alcoholism, Breath Tests, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Male, Naltrexone, Narcotic Antagonists, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review