Memory for emotional events: differential effects of centrally versus peripherally acting β-blocking agents
Abstract
Substantial evidence from animal research indicates that enhanced memory associated with emotional experiences involves activation of the beta-adrenergic system. This hypothesis is further supported by the finding in human subjects that blockade of beta-adrenergic receptors with propranolol selectively reduced memory for emotional events. In the present study, we compared the effects of propranolol, a lipid soluble drug which crosses the blood-brain barrier easily, with those of nadolol, a water soluble drug which crosses the blood-brain barrier to a considerably lesser extent, to determine whether the effect involved peripheral or central beta-adrenergic receptors. The effects of these drugs, taken before subjects watched a slide show that was either emotionally arousing or relatively neutral in content, were tested 1 week later with a surprise memory test. Consistent with previous results, propranolol impaired memory (recall and recognition) in the subjects who saw the emotional version of the slide show. In contrast, nadolol did not impair memory of the emotional slide show. These results indicate that the blockade of central beta-adrenergic receptors is responsible for the reduction in storage of emotional events. The results support the view that memory of a mild emotional event involves activation of central, but not necessarily peripheral beta-adrenergic receptors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Memory for emotional stimuli is impaired by propranolol but not nadolol, suggesting a central location for the relevant β-adrenoceptors.
“Van Stegeren et al (1998) found that memory for emotional stimuli was impaired by propranolol but not nadolol, suggesting a central location for the relevant β-adrenoceptors.”
From Propranolol reduces implicit negative racial bias (2012) · cites this paper as Van Stegeren et al (1998)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 230
- Authors
- van Stegeren, A. H., Everaerd, W., Cahill, L., McGaugh, J. L., & Gooren, L. J. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 1998-07-27
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 305-310
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- OpenAlex
- W2002637112
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- emotional memory, beta-adrenergic receptors, propranolol, nadolol, blood-brain barrier, memory impairment, emotional arousal, memory consolidation, recognition memory, memory retrieval
- MeSH terms
- Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Adult, Blood Pressure, Double-Blind Method, Emotions, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Memory, Nadolol, Neuropsychological Tests, Propranolol, Receptors, Adrenergic, beta
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review