Specific attentional dysfunction in adults following early start of cannabis use
Abstract
Rationale and objective The present study tested the hypothesis that chronic interference by cannabis with endogenous cannabinoid systems during peripubertal development causes specific and persistent brain alterations in humans. As an index of cannabinoid action, visual scanning, along with other attentional functions, was chosen. Visual scanning undergoes a major maturation process around age 12-15 years and, in addition, the visual system is known to react specifically and sensitively to cannabinoids. Methods From 250 individuals consuming cannabis regularly, 99 healthy pure cannabis users were selected. They were free of any other past or present drug abuse, or history of neuropsychiatric disease. After an interview, physical examination, analysis of routine laboratory parameters, plasma/urine analyses for drugs, and MMPI testing, users and respective controls were subjected to a computer-assisted attention test battery comprising visual scanning, alertness, divided attention, flexibility, and working memory. Results Of the potential predictors of test performance within the user group, including present age, age of onset of cannabis use, degree of acute intoxication (THC+THCOH plasma levels), and cumulative toxicity (estimated total life dose), an early age of onset turned out to be the only predictor, predicting impaired reaction times exclusively in visual scanning. Early-onset users (onset before age 16; n = 48) showed a significant impairment in reaction times in this function, whereas late-onset users (onset after age 16; n = 51) did not differ from controls (n = 49). Conclusions These data suggest that beginning cannabis use during early adolescence may lead to enduring effects on specific attentional functions in adulthood. Apparently, vulnerable periods during brain development exist that are subject to persistent alterations by interfering exogenous cannabinoids.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adolescent marijuana exposure results in acute and persistent impaired attentional capabilities.
“Likewise, adolescent marijuana exposure results in acute (Jacobsen et al. 2004; Harvey et al. 2007) and persistent (Ehrenreich et al. 1999; Meier et al. 2012) impaired attentional capabilities.”
From The long-term cognitive consequences of adolescent exposure to recreational drugs of abuse (2018) · cites this paper as Ehrenreich et al. 1999
The Results and discussion (p. 6) associate cannabis use beginning by about age 16 with a persistent, specific visual-scanning impairment in adulthood; the abstract (p. 1) says early use may lead to enduring effects. This supports the persistent-attention portion for which Ehrenreich et al. is cited, but the claim states a causal result and describes attentional capabilities more broadly than the measured effect. The acute portion is attributed to other sources, not this one. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 387
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Halgren E, Marinkovic K (1995) Neurophysiological networks integrating human emotions. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The cognitive neurosciences. MIT, Cambridge, Mass., pp 1137-1151
- Authors
- Ehrenreich, H., Kunert, H. J., Moeller, M. R., Poser, W., Schilling, L., Gigerenzer, G., Hoehe, M. R., & Rinn, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Göttingen (DE)
- Saarland University (DE)
- University Medical Centre Mannheim (DE)
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
- Max Delbrück Center (DE)
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 1999-03-04
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-301
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- OpenAlex
- W2153898074
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- cannabis use, age of onset, visual exploration, attentional dysfunction, endocannabinoid system, peripubertal development, brain development, reaction time, working memory, divided attention
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cannabinoids, Cannabis, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Reaction Time, Age of Onset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review