The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comprehensive screening and quantification of veterinary drugs in milk using UPLC–ToF-MS
Open accessAbstract
Ultra-performance liquid chromatography combined with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-ToF-MS) has been used for screening and quantification of more than 100 veterinary drugs in milk. The veterinary drugs represent different classes including benzimidazoles, macrolides, penicillins, quinolones, sulphonamides, pyrimidines, tetracylines, nitroimidazoles, tranquillizers, ionophores, amphenicols and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs). After protein precipitation, centrifugation and solid-phase extraction (SPE), the extracts were analysed by UPLC-ToF-MS. From the acquired full scan data the drug-specific ions were extracted for construction of the chromatograms and evaluation of the results. The analytical method was validated according to the EU guidelines (2002/657/EC) for a quantitative screening method. At the concentration level of interest (MRL level) the results for repeatability (%RSD < 20% for 86% of the compounds), reproducibility (%RSD < 40% for 96% of the compounds) and the accuracy (80-120% for 88% of the compounds) were satisfactory. Evaluation of the CCbeta values and the linearity results demonstrates that the developed method shows adequate sensitivity and linearity to provide quantitative results. Furthermore, the method is accurate enough to differentiate between suspected and negative samples or drug concentrations below or above the MRL. A set of 100 samples of raw milk were screened for residues. No suspected (positive) results were obtained except for the included blind reference sample containing sulphamethazine (88 microg/l) that tested positive for this compound. UPLC-ToF-MS combines high resolution for both LC and MS with high mass accuracy which is very powerful for the multi-compound analysis of veterinary drugs. The technique seems to be powerful enough for the analysis of not only veterinary drugs but also organic contaminants like pesticides, mycotoxins and plant toxins in one single method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mol, H. G. J., Plaza-Bolaños, P., Zomer, P., de Rijk, T. C., Stolker, A. A. M., & Mulder, P. P. J. (2008) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac801557f · Cited by 431
Self-citationHerrera-Herrera, A. V., Hernández-Borges, J., Rodríguez-Delgado, M. A., Herrero, M., & Cifuentes, A. (2011) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2011.05.066 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Stolker, A. A. M., Rutgers, P., Oosterink, E., Lasaroms, J. J. P., Peters, R. J. B., van Rhijn, J. A., & Nielen, M. W. F.
- Venue
- Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
- Published
- 2008-05-20
- Volume
- 391
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2309-2322
- ISSN
- 1618-2642 (ISSN-L)
- 1618-2650
- OpenAlex
- W2136385274
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comprehensive screening and quantification of veterinary drugs in milk using UPLC–ToF-MS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00216-008-2168-8
- The paper
- Stolker, A. A. M., Rutgers, P., Oosterink, E., Lasaroms, J. J. P., Peters, R. J. B., van Rhijn, J. A., & Nielen, M. W. F. (2008). Comprehensive screening and quantification of veterinary drugs in milk using UPLC–ToF-MS. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-008-2168-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.