The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational mass spectrometry for metabolomics: Identification of metabolites and small molecules
Open accessAbstract
The identification of compounds from mass spectrometry (MS) data is still seen as a major bottleneck in the interpretation of MS data. This is particularly the case for the identification of small compounds such as metabolites, where until recently little progress has been made. Here we review the available approaches to annotation and identification of chemical compounds based on electrospray ionization (ESI-MS) data. The methods are not limited to metabolomics applications, but are applicable to any small compounds amenable to MS analysis. Starting with the definition of identification, we focus on the analysis of tandem mass and MS(n) spectra, which can provide a wealth of structural information. Searching in libraries of reference spectra provides the most reliable source of identification, especially if measured on comparable instruments. We review several choices for the distance functions. The identification without reference spectra is even more challenging, because it requires approaches to interpret tandem mass spectra with regard to the molecular structure. Both commercial and free tools are capable of mining general-purpose compound libraries, and identifying candidate compounds. The holy grail of computational mass spectrometry is the de novo deduction of structure hypotheses for compounds, where method development has only started thus far. In a case study, we apply several of the available methods to the three compounds, kaempferol, reserpine, and verapamil, and investigate whether this results in reliable identifications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sumner, L. W., Amberg, A., Barrett, D., Beale, M. H., Beger, R., Daykin, C. A., Fan, T. W.-M., Fiehn, O., Goodacre, R., Griffin, J. L., et al. (2007) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-007-0082-2 · Cited by 5,368
In silico fragmentation for computer assisted identification of metabolite mass spectra
Wolf, S., Schmidt, S., Müller-Hannemann, M., & Neumann, S. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-148 · Cited by 698
Self-citation
Cited by
The Structure and Function of Major Plant Metabolite Modifications
Wang, S., Alseekh, S., Fernie, A. R., & Luo, J. (2019) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2019.06.001 · Cited by 428
Kuehnbaum, N. L., & Britz-McKibbin, P. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300484s · Cited by 354
Spatial Metabolomics and Imaging Mass Spectrometry in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Alexandrov, T. (2020) · Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-011420-031537 · Cited by 284
Annotating metabolite mass spectra with domain-inspired chemical formula transformers
Goldman, S., Wohlwend, J., Stražar, M., Haroush, G., Xavier, R. J., & Coley, C. W. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00708-3 · Cited by 87
New developments in the trace analysis of organic water pollutants
Fischer, K., Fries, E., Körner, W., Schmalz, C., & Zwiener, C. (2012) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-012-3929-z · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Neumann, S., & Böcker, S.
- Venue
- Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
- Published
- 2010-10-09
- Volume
- 398
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 2779-2788
- ISSN
- 1618-2642 (ISSN-L)
- 1618-2650
- OpenAlex
- W1963989877
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational mass spectrometry for metabolomics: Identification of metabolites and small molecules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00216-010-4142-5
- The paper
- Neumann, S., & Böcker, S. (2010). Computational mass spectrometry for metabolomics: Identification of metabolites and small molecules. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4142-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.