Use of primary literature in the undergraduate analytical class
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Hoskins, S. G., Lopatto, D., & Stevens, L. M. (2011) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.11-03-0027 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Gottesman, A. J., & Hoskins, S. G. (2013) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.12-11-0201 · Cited by 123 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A variation of this model, the CREATE method, is based on progressive analysis of a series of papers from the same research laboratory [7, 8].”
MethodRound, J. E., & Campbell, A. M. (2013) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.11-07-0057 · Cited by 110 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Students who have read primary literature change the way they approach articles in the future, spending more time examining figures and comprehending subsequent articles more completely [1, 3, 6].”
BackgroundSato, B. K., Kadandale, P., He, W., Murata, P. M. N., Latif, Y., & Warschauer, M. (2014) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.14-02-0025 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Teaching students to read the primary literature using pogil activities
Murray, T. A. (2014) · Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education · doi:10.1002/bmb.20765 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
A focused assignment encouraging deep reading in undergraduate biochemistry
Spiegelberg, B. D. (2014) · Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education · doi:10.1002/bmb.20744 · Cited by 17 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Other assignments focus on interpretation of figures [6, 19], student dialogue with the article text [20], or translation of”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Rauschert ESJ, Dauer J, Momsen JL, Sutton-Grier A. Primary lit- erature across the undergraduate curriculum: teaching science pro- cess skills and content: summary and comments from the workshop B101 ways to effectively use journal articles as teaching tools^ presented at the 2011 ESA Annual Meeting. Bull Ecol Soc Am. 2011;92:396-405.
- Brownell SE, Price JV, Steinman L. A writing-intensive course improves biology undergraduates' perception and confidence of their abilities to read scientific literature and communicate science. Adv Physiol Educ. 2013;37:70-9.
- Yeong FM. Using primary-literature-based assessments to highlight connections between sub-topics in cell biology. J NUS Teach Acad. 2013;3:34-48.
- Forest K, Rayne S. Incorporating Primary literature summary projects into a first-year chemistry curriculum. J Chem Educ. 2009;86:592.
- Braun I, Nückles M. Scholarly holds lead over popular and instruc- tional: text type influences epistemological reading outcomes. Sci Educ. 2014;98:867-904.
- Committee on Professional Training. Undergraduate professional edu- cation in chemistry: ACS guidelines and evaluation procedures for bachelor's degree programs. ACS. 2008. http://www.acs.org/content/ dam/acsorg/about/governance/committees/training/2015-acs- guidelines-for-bachelors-degree-programs.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2015.
- Fang Z. Scientific literacy: a systemic functional linguistics per- spective. Sci Educ. 2005;89:335-47.
- Jacques-Fricke BT, Hubert A, Miller S. A versatile module to im- prove understanding of scientific literature through peer instruction. J Coll Sci Teach. 2009;39:24-32.
- Janicke-Butler D. Getting undergraduates to critically read and dis- cuss primary literature. J Coll Sci Teach. 1997;27:29-32.
- Shannon S, Winterman B. Student comprehension of primary liter- ature is aided by companion assignments emphasizing pattern rec- ognition and information literacy. Issues Sci Technol Lib. 2012;68. doi:10.5062/F4TB14TS. · DOI
- Van Lacum E, Ossevoort M, Buikema H, Goedhart M. First expe- riences with reading primary literature by undergraduate life science students. Int J Sci Educ. 2012;34:1795-821.
- Bogucka R et al. How to read scientific research articles: a hands-on classroom exercise. Iss Sci Technol Lib. 2009;59. doi:10.5062/ F4S180FF. · DOI
- McDonough V. Improving journal club: increasing student discus- sion and understanding of primary literature in molecular biology through the use of dialectical notes. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2012;40:330-2.
- McCallum ML. A method for encouraging classroom discussion of scientific papers. Bull Ecol Soc Am. 2010;91:363-6.
- Scott LK, Simmons SR. Incorporating primary literature in under- graduate crop science courses. J Nat Res Life Sci Educ 2006;35: 225-33.
- Liotta LJ, Almeida CA. Organic chemistry of the cell: an interdis- ciplinary approach to learning with a focus on reading, analyzing, and critiquing primary literature. J Chem Educ. 2005;82:1794.
- Wright S, Malcolm A, Wright C, et al. A microelectromechanical systems-enabled, miniature triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Anal Chem. 2015;87:3115-22.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Situmorang, M., Sinaga, M., Purba, J., Daulay, S. I., Simorangkir, M., Sitorus, M., & Sudrajat, A. (2018) · Journal of Baltic Science Education · doi:10.33225/jbse/18.17.535 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“It has been reported that reading the primary literature enhances student learning in writing, interpreting the figures and data, as well as their critical thinking skills from evaluating the evidence and critiquing the arguments (Kovarik, 2016; Tu¨may, 2016).”
BackgroundGoudsouzian, L. K., & Hsu, J. L. (2023) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.22-10-0211 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kovarik, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Trinity College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kovarik, Michelle L.
- ORCID
- Kovarik, Michelle L.
- Venue
- Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
- Published
- 2016-03-23
- Volume
- 408
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3045-3049
- ISSN
- 1618-2642 (ISSN-L)
- 1618-2650
- OpenAlex
- W2311541781
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1118600)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (K12GM000678)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Various Chemistry Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Keywords
- primary literature, literature-based learning, information literacy
- MeSH terms
- Education, Science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
