Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 32Geometric Analysis and Curvature FlowsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 16 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Equality in the Spacetime Positive Mass Theorem

Open access
Huang, Lan-Hsuan, Lee, Dan A.·2020·Communications in Mathematical Physics

Abstract

We affirm the rigidity conjecture of the spacetime positive mass theorem in dimensions less than eight. Namely, if an asymptotically flat initial data set satisfies the dominant energy condition and has E=|P|\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$E=|P|$$\end{document}, then E=|P|=0\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$E=|P|=0$$\end{document}, where (E, P) is the ADM energy-momentum vector. The dimensional restriction can be removed if we assume the positive mass inequality holds. Previously the result was only known for spin manifolds (Beig and Chruściel in J Math Phys37(4):1939–1961, 1996; Chruściel and Maerten in J Math Phys 47(2), 2006).

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

The paper proves the rigidity case of the spacetime positive mass theorem: for asymptotically flat initial data sets satisfying the dominant energy condition, \(E=|P|\) forces \(E=|P|=0\), in dimensions \(3\le n\le 7\), and more generally whenever the positive mass inequality holds near the data. The proof is variational, using a modified Regge-Teitelboim Hamiltonian and the modified constraint operator, and does not assume spin.

Key findings

  • Theorem 1: for \(3\le n\le 7\), if an \(n\)-dimensional asymptotically flat initial data set satisfies the dominant energy condition and has \(E=|P|\), then \(E=|P|=0\).
  • Theorem 3: for \(n\ge 3\), if the positive mass inequality holds near \((g,k)\), then \(E=|P|\) again implies \(E=|P|=0\); the dimensional restriction can be removed under this assumption.
  • The result affirms the rigidity conjecture of the spacetime positive mass theorem, previously known for spin manifolds by Beig-Chruściel in three dimensions and Chruściel-Maerten in higher dimensions.
  • Combined with prior \(E=0\) characterization results, the theorem implies the equality case embeds into Minkowski spacetime with induced second fundamental form \(k\) (with an additional \(n=3\) decay assumption \(\operatorname{tr}_g k=O(|x|^{-s})\), \(s>2\)).

Methods

  • The proof uses a variational approach: a modified Regge-Teitelboim Hamiltonian built from the modified constraint operator \(\Phi_{(g,\pi)}\) of Huang-Corvino, replacing the usual constraint operator.
  • Under \(E=|P|\), the Sobolev positive mass inequality is used to show \((g,k)\) locally minimizes this Hamiltonian on its \(\Phi_{(g,\pi)}\) level set; Lagrange multipliers then produce a lapse-shift pair \((f,X)\) in the kernel of the adjoint linearized modified constraint operator, asymptotic to \((E,-2P)\).
  • A separate theorem, adapting Beig-Chruściel’s argument, shows that such an asymptotically translational vacuum Killing lapse-shift pair forces \(E=|P|=0\).

Limitations

  • The paper states the dimensional restriction \(3\le n\le 7\) comes from possible singularities of marginally outer trapped hypersurfaces in the positive mass inequality; the restriction is removed only if the positive mass inequality is assumed near \((g,k)\).
  • The paper notes the nonstandard technical assumption \(q+\alpha>n-2\) in Definition 2.5 is needed only for Theorem 5.4/Lemma A.10, not elsewhere.
  • Remark 2.11 states that a weaker regularity assumption in a prior paper was insufficient and that stronger hypotheses are needed for the adjoint-equation unique continuation argument; the present proof relies on the positive mass inequality as an input rather than proving it in all dimensions.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00220-019-03619-w

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 12 Not checked · 30 Own results and interpretations

28 more claims

Create a free account to see all 42 claims and to verify the 16 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 9

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Meyers, N.: An expansion about infinity for solutions of linear elliptic equations. J. Math. Mech. 12, 247–264 (1963). MR 0149072

Cited by

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Huang, L.-H., & Lee, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Queens College, CUNY (US)
Corresponding author
Huang, Lan-Hsuan
Venue
Communications in Mathematical Physics
Published
2019-11-18
Volume
376
Issue
3
Pages
2379-2407
ISSN
  • 0010-3616 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0916
OpenAlex
W2986722835
Cited by
32
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Communications in Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DMS~1452477)
  • Simons Foundation (Simons Fellowship)
  • Institute for Advanced Study (von Neumann Fellowship)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
asymptotically flat initial data, dominant energy condition, spin manifolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.