Cited by 133Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureNumerical methods for differential equationsQuantum many-body systems

Quantum Spectral Methods for Differential Equations

Open access
Childs, Andrew M., Liu, Jin-Peng·2020·Communications in Mathematical Physics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00220-020-03699-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Available literature reveals the application of quantum algorithms to solve linear and differential equations, where these algorithms play the role of subroutines in algorithms on data processing.

    “Available pieces of literature reveal the application of quantum algorithms to solve linear [75] and differential equations [76-78], where these algorithms play the role of 'subroutines' in algorithms on data processing.”

    From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [78]

    The Introduction (pp. 1–2) describes quantum algorithms for differential equations built on a quantum linear-systems algorithm, and the Discussion (p. 22) says this paper presents an algorithm for linear ODEs. It does not establish the further claim that equation-solving algorithms serve as subroutines in data-processing algorithms. The subroutines mentioned in the Introduction (p. 3) instead provide inputs to this paper’s algorithm. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 133

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [2][2] Tom M. Apostol, Calculus, Volume II , Wiley (1969). -
  2. [3][3] Juan Miguel Arrazola, Timjan Kalajdzievski, Christian Weedbrook, and Seth Lloyd, Quantum algorithm for non-homogeneous linear partial differential equations , arXiv:1809.02622. - · arXiv
  3. [4][4] Esmail Babolian and Mohammad Mahdi Hosseini, A modified spectral method for numerical solution of ordinary differential equations with non-analytic solution , Applied Mathematics and Computation (2002), 132(2), 341-351. -
  4. [7][7] Dominic W. Berry, Andrew M. Childs, Richard Cleve, Robin Kothari, and Rolando D. Somma, Exponential improvement in precision for simulating sparse Hamiltonians , Proceedings of the 46th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (2014), pp. 283-292, arXiv:1312.1414. - · arXiv
  5. [8][8] Dominic W. Berry, Andrew M. Childs, Richard Cleve, Robin Kothari, and Rolando D. Somma, Simulating Hamiltonian dynamics with a truncated Taylor series , Physical Review Letters (2015), 114, no. 9, 090502, arXiv:1412.4687. - · arXiv
  6. [9][9] Dominic W. Berry, Andrew M. Childs, and Robin Kothari, Hamiltonian simulation with nearly optimal dependence on all parameters , Proceedings of the 56th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (2015), pp. 792-809, arXiv:1501.01715. - · arXiv
  7. [10][10] Dominic W. Berry, Andrew M. Childs, Aaron Ostrander, Guoming Wang, Quantum algorithm for linear differential equations with exponentially improved dependence on precision , Communications in Mathematical Physics (2017), 356, no. 3, 1057-1081, arXiv:1701.03684. - · arXiv
  8. [11][11] Dominic W. Berry and Leonardo Novo, Corrected quantum walk for optimal Hamiltonian simulation , Quantum Information and Computation (2016), 16, no. 15-16, 1295, arXiv:1606.03443. - · arXiv
  9. [15][15] Andrew M. Childs, Robin Kothari, and Rolando D. Somma, Quantum linear systems algorithm with exponentially improved dependence on precision , SIAM Journal on Computing (2017), 46, 1920-1950, arXiv:1511.02306. - · arXiv
  10. [16][16] B. David Clader, Bryan C. Jacobs, and Chad R. Sprouse, Preconditioned quantum linear system algorithm , Physical Review Letters (2013), 110.25, 250504, arXiv:1301.2340. - · arXiv
  11. [17][17] Pedro Costa, Stephen Jordan, and Aaron Ostrander, Quantum algorithm for simulating the wave equation , arXiv:1711.05394. - · arXiv
  12. [18][18] Lawrence C. Evans, Partial differential equations (2nd ed.) , American Mathematical Society (2010). -
  13. [22][22] Mohammad Mahdi Hosseini, A modified pseudospectral method for numerical solution of ordinary differential equations systems , Applied Mathematics and Computation (2006), 176 (2), 470-475. -
  14. [23][23] John David Jackson, Classical electrodynamics , John Wiley & Sons (2012). -
  15. [24][24] David Kahaner, Cleve Moler, and Stephen Nash, Numerical methods and software , Prentice Hall (1989). -
  16. [28][28] Guang Hao Low and Isaac L. Chuang, Hamiltonian simulation by qubitization , arXiv:1610.06546. - · arXiv
  17. [29][29] Guang Hao Low and Isaac L. Chuang, Optimal Hamiltonian simulation by quantum signal processing , Physical Review Letters (2017), 118, no. 9, 010501, arXiv:1606.02685. - · arXiv
  18. [31][31] David Poulin, Angie Qarry, Rolando D. Somma, and Frank Verstraete, Quantum simulation of time-dependent Hamiltonians and the convenient illusion of Hilbert space , Physical Review Letters (2011), 106, 170501, arXiv:1102.1360. - · arXiv
  19. [33][33] Vivek V. Shende, Stephen S. Bullock, and Igor L. Markov, Synthesis of quantum-logic circuits , IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems (2006), 25(6) 1000-1010, arXiv:quant-ph/0406176. - · arXiv
  20. [34][34] R. K. Michael Thambynayagam, The diffusion handbook: Applied solutions for engineers , McGraw-Hill Professional (2011). -
  21. [36][36] Vladimir Antonovich Zorich, Mathematical analysis II , Springer (2004).

Authors
Childs, A. M., & Liu, J.-P.
Affiliations
Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Jin-Peng
Venue
Communications in Mathematical Physics
Published
2020-02-18
Volume
375
Issue
2
Pages
1427-1457
ISSN
  • 0010-3616 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0916
OpenAlex
W2908285344
Cited by
133
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications in Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Army Research Office (MURI award W911NF-16-1-0349)
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • National Science Foundation (1526380, 1813814)
  • U.S. Department of Energy Quantum Algorithms Teams
  • U.S. Department of Energy Quantum Testbed Pathfinder (DE-SC0019040)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Numerical Analysis › Numerical methods for differential equations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
quantum algorithms, spectral methods, linear ordinary differential equations, time-dependent coefficients, initial value problems, boundary value problems, quantum linear systems, numerical solution of differential equations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review