The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Processing of temporal information and the basal ganglia: new evidence from fMRI
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Temporal information processing is a fundamental brain function, which might include central timekeeping mechanisms independent of sensory modality. Psychopharmacological and patient studies suggest a crucial role of the basal ganglia in time estimation. In this study, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was applied in 15 healthy right-handed male subjects performing an auditory time estimation task (duration discrimination of tone pairs in the range of 1,000–1,400 ms) and frequency discriminations (tone pairs differing in pitch, around 1,000 Hz) as an active control task. Task difficulty was constantly modulated by an adaptive algorithm (weighted up-down method) reacting on individual performance. Time estimation (vs rest condition) elicited a distinct pattern of cerebral activity, including the right medial and both left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (DLPFC), thalamus, basal ganglia (caudate nucleus and putamen), left anterior cingulate cortex, and superior temporal auditory areas. Most activations showed lateralisation to the right hemisphere and were similar in the frequency discrimination task. Comparing time and frequency tasks, we isolated activation in the right putamen restricted to time estimation only. This result supports the notion of central processing of temporal information associated with basal ganglia activity. Temporal information processing in the brain might thus be a distributed process of interaction between modality-dependent sensory cortical function, the putamen (with a timing-specific function), and additional prefrontal cortical systems related to attention and memory. Further investigations are needed to delineate the differential contributions of the striatum and other areas to timing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing
Zatorre, R. J., Evans, A. C., Meyer, E., & Gjedde, A. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.256.5058.846 · Cited by 1,507
Cited by
Rhythm and Beat Perception in Motor Areas of the Brain
Grahn, J. A., & Brett, M. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.893 · Cited by 1,050
The neural basis of temporal processing
Mauk, M. D., & Buonomano, D. V. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144247 · Cited by 976
Functional Anatomy of the Attentional Modulation of Time Estimation
Coull, J. T., Vidal, F., Nazarian, B., & Macar, F. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091573 · Cited by 642
The image of time: A voxel-wise meta-analysis
Wiener, M., Turkeltaub, P., & Coslett, H. B. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.064 · Cited by 594
Distinguishable brain activation networks for short- and long-term motor skill learning
Floyer-Lea, A., & Matthews, P. M. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00717.2004 · Cited by 422
Metadata
- Authors
- Nenadic, I., Gaser, C., Volz, H.-P., Rammsayer, T., Häger, F., & Sauer, H.
- Venue
- Experimental Brain Research
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 238-246
- ISSN
- 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1106
- OpenAlex
- W2113660224
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Processing of temporal information and the basal ganglia: new evidence from fMRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00221-002-1188-4
- The paper
- Nenadic, I., Gaser, C., Volz, H.-P., Rammsayer, T., Häger, F., & Sauer, H. (2003). Processing of temporal information and the basal ganglia: new evidence from fMRI. Experimental Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1188-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.