TMS of the occipital cortex induces tactile sensations in the fingers of blind Braille readers
Abstract
Various non-visual inputs produce cross-modal responses in the visual cortex of early blind subjects. In order to determine the qualitative experience associated with these occipital activations, we systematically stimulated the entire occipital cortex using single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in early blind subjects and in blindfolded seeing controls. Whereas blindfolded seeing controls reported only phosphenes following occipital cortex stimulation, some of the blind subjects reported tactile sensations in the fingers that were somatotopically organized onto the visual cortex. The number of cortical sites inducing tactile sensations appeared to be related to the number of hours of Braille reading per day, Braille reading speed and dexterity. These data, taken in conjunction with previous anatomical, behavioural and functional imaging results, suggest the presence of a polysynaptic cortical pathway between the somatosensory cortex and the visual cortex in early blind subjects. These results also add new evidence that the activity of the occipital lobe in the blind takes its qualitative expression from the character of its new input source, therefore supporting the cortical deference hypothesis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stimulation of the visual cortex in congenitally blind individuals can inadvertently produce tactile sensations rather than visual phosphenes, particularly in blind subjects who had undertaken extensive training with sensory substitution systems.
“Of note, stimulation of the visual cortex in congenitally blind individuals can inadvertently produce tactile sensations rather than visual phosphenes, particularly in blind subjects who had undertaken extensive training with sensory substitution systems.39–41”
From Visual Prostheses in the Era of Artificial Intelligence Technology (2025) · cites this paper as [40]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 113
- Authors
- Ptito, M., Fumal, A., de Noordhout, A. M., Schoenen, J., Gjedde, A., & Kupers, R.
- Affiliations
- Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
- Centre hospitalier régional de la Citadelle (BE)
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Rigshospitalet (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Ptito, M.
- Venue
- Experimental Brain Research
- Published
- 2007-08-24
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-200
- ISSN
- 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1106
- OpenAlex
- W1993666510
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Keywords
- cross-modal plasticity, early blindness, Braille reading, occipital cortex, tactile perception, phosphenes, somatotopic organization, polysynaptic pathways, somatosensory cortex, visual cortex, transcranial magnetic stimulation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blindness, Brain Mapping, Female, Fingers, Humans, Language, Functional Laterality, Learning, Male, Neural Pathways, Neuronal Plasticity, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reading, Sensory Aids, Sensory Deprivation, Somatosensory Cortex, Touch, Verbal Behavior, Visual Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review