Trace eyeblink conditioning in patients with cerebellar degeneration: comparison of short and long trace intervals
Abstract
To elucidate whether the cerebellar cortex may contribute to trace eyeblink conditioning in humans, eight patients with degenerative cerebellar disorders (four with sporadic adult onset ataxia, three with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type III and one with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6) and eight age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects were investigated. Individual high resolution three-dimensional MRI data sets were acquired. As revealed by volumetric measurements of the cerebellum using ECCET software, patients showed cerebellar atrophy to various degrees. No abnormalities were observed in the control subjects. Eyeblink conditioning was performed twice using a tone of 40 ms as conditioned stimulus, followed by a short (400 ms) and a long (1,000 ms) trace interval and an air-puff of 100 ms as unconditioned stimulus. Using the short trace interval, eyeblink conditioning was significantly impaired in cerebellar patients compared to controls, even in those who fulfilled criteria of awareness. Using the long trace interval no significant group differences could be observed. The present findings of impaired trace eyeblink acquisition in patients with cortical cerebellar degeneration suggest that the cerebellar cortex in humans, in addition to the interposed nucleus, is involved in trace eyeblink conditioning, if the trace interval is relatively short. Using a long trace interval, the cerebellum appears to be less important.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deficits in eye blink conditioning in autistic disorder and after cerebellar lesions provide evidence for an altered olivocerebellar clock-signal for sensory timing below the level of perceptual awareness.
“Deficits in eye blink conditioning in AD [49] and after cerebellar lesions [50] provide evidence for an altered olivocerebellar “clock-signal” for sensory timing that occurs below the level of perceptual awareness [51] as illustrated in Figure 1.”
From Consensus Paper: Pathological Role of the Cerebellum in Autism (2012) · cites this paper as [50]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Gerwig, M., Eßer, A. C., Guberina, H., Frings, M., Kolb, F. P., Forsting, M., Aurich, V., Beck, A., & Timmann, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Gerwig, M.
- Venue
- Experimental Brain Research
- Published
- 2008-02-06
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-96
- ISSN
- 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1106
- OpenAlex
- W2010193142
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Keywords
- trace eyeblink conditioning, cerebellar degeneration, cerebellar atrophy, cerebellar cortex, trace interval, cerebellar ataxia, spinocerebellar ataxia type 6, interposed nucleus, conditioned stimulus
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Cerebellar Ataxia, Cerebellar Cortex, Cerebellar Diseases, Cerebellar Nuclei, Cerebellum, Conditioning, Eyelid, Female, Genes, Dominant, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Predictive Value of Tests, Reaction Time, Reflex, Abnormal, Time Factors, Spinocerebellar Ataxias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review