Cited by 73Action Observation and SynchronizationNeural dynamics and brain functionFree Will and Agency

Attention modulates motor system activation during action observation: Evidence for inhibitory rebound

Open access
Schuch, Stefanie, Bayliss, Andrew P., Klein, Christoph, Tipper, Steven P.·2010·Experimental Brain Research

Abstract

Perceiving another individual's actions activates the human motor system. We investigated whether this effect is stronger when the observed action is relevant to the observer's task. The mu rhythm (oscillatory activity in the 8- to 13-Hz band over sensorimotor cortex) was measured while participants watched videos of grasping movements. In one of two conditions, the participants had to later report how many times they had seen a certain kind of grasp. In the other condition, they viewed the identical videos but had to later report how many times they had seen a certain colour change. The colour change and the grasp always occurred simultaneously. Results show mu rhythm attenuation when watching the videos relative to baseline. This attenuation was stronger when participants later reported the grasp rather than the colour, suggesting that the motor system is more strongly activated when the observed grasping actions were relevant to the observer's task. Moreover, when the graspable object disappeared after the offset of the video, there was subsequent mu rhythm enhancement, reflecting a post-stimulus inhibitory rebound. This enhancement was again stronger when making judgments about the grasp than the colour, suggesting that the stronger activation is followed by a stronger inhibitory rebound.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00221-010-2358-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As external input increases, inhibition has to increase accordingly, visible as larger inhibitory rebounds following stimulus offset.

    “As the external input increases, inhibition has to increase accordingly, and this is visible in the form of larger inhibitory rebounds following stimulus offset (Houghton et al., 1996;Schuch et al., 2010).”

    From Automatic imitation of multiple agents: A computational model (2019) · cites this paper as Schuch et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 73

Authors
Schuch, S., Bayliss, A. P., Klein, C., & Tipper, S. P.
Affiliations
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Schuch, Stefanie
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Published
2010-07-20
Volume
205
Issue
2
Pages
235-249
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
OpenAlex
W2119573487
Cited by
73
References
72
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (WT071924)
  • Leverhulme Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
action observation, attention, mu rhythm, sensorimotor cortex, grasping motion, task relevance, mirror neuron system
MeSH terms
Attention, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Efferent Pathways, Electrodes, Electroencephalography, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Motion Perception, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Artifacts, Hand Strength, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review