Attention modulates motor system activation during action observation: Evidence for inhibitory rebound
Open accessAbstract
Perceiving another individual's actions activates the human motor system. We investigated whether this effect is stronger when the observed action is relevant to the observer's task. The mu rhythm (oscillatory activity in the 8- to 13-Hz band over sensorimotor cortex) was measured while participants watched videos of grasping movements. In one of two conditions, the participants had to later report how many times they had seen a certain kind of grasp. In the other condition, they viewed the identical videos but had to later report how many times they had seen a certain colour change. The colour change and the grasp always occurred simultaneously. Results show mu rhythm attenuation when watching the videos relative to baseline. This attenuation was stronger when participants later reported the grasp rather than the colour, suggesting that the motor system is more strongly activated when the observed grasping actions were relevant to the observer's task. Moreover, when the graspable object disappeared after the offset of the video, there was subsequent mu rhythm enhancement, reflecting a post-stimulus inhibitory rebound. This enhancement was again stronger when making judgments about the grasp than the colour, suggesting that the stronger activation is followed by a stronger inhibitory rebound.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As external input increases, inhibition has to increase accordingly, visible as larger inhibitory rebounds following stimulus offset.
“As the external input increases, inhibition has to increase accordingly, and this is visible in the form of larger inhibitory rebounds following stimulus offset (Houghton et al., 1996;Schuch et al., 2010).”
From Automatic imitation of multiple agents: A computational model (2019) · cites this paper as Schuch et al., 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 72 · Cited by 73
- Authors
- Schuch, S., Bayliss, A. P., Klein, C., & Tipper, S. P.
- Affiliations
- Bangor University (GB)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schuch, Stefanie
- Venue
- Experimental Brain Research
- Published
- 2010-07-20
- Volume
- 205
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 235-249
- ISSN
- 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1106
- PMC
- PMC2914260
- OpenAlex
- W2119573487
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (WT071924)
- Leverhulme Trust
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
- Keywords
- action observation, attention, mu rhythm, sensorimotor cortex, grasping motion, task relevance, mirror neuron system
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Efferent Pathways, Electrodes, Electroencephalography, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Motion Perception, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Artifacts, Hand Strength, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review