Social attitudes differentially modulate imitation in adolescents and adults
Open accessAbstract
Previous studies have demonstrated a bidirectional relationship between social attitudes and imitation in adults: pro-social attitudes promote imitation, and imitation further increases positive social attitudes. Social attitudes and the social brain are developing throughout the adolescent years. Thus, the aim of this study was to test whether pro-social attitudes promote imitation in an Adolescent Group to the same extent as in an Adult Group. Participants were primed with pro-social or non-social words in a Scrambled Sentence Priming task. They then completed an Imitation task wherein participants were required to perform a lift action with either the index or middle finger, whilst observing either a compatible action (e.g. index finger response and observed index finger lift) or an incompatible action (e.g. index finger response and observed middle finger lift). In an Effector Priming control condition, observed fingers remained stationary but a semi-transparent green mask was added to either the compatible or incompatible finger. The magnitude of the Imitation Effect and Effector Priming Effect was calculated by subtracting reaction times on compatible trials from those on incompatible trials. In the Adult Group, social priming specifically modulated the Imitation Effect: pro-social priming produced a larger Imitation Effect but did not modulate the Effector Priming Effect. In adolescents, however, no effect of social priming was seen on either the Imitation or Effector Priming measures. We consider possible explanations for these results including the immature development of social brain regions and reduced experience of the relationship between social attitudes and imitation in adolescence.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A control task was included so that imitation and imitation-inhibition could be distinguished from attentional or distractor-inhibition problems and from motor deficits.
“We therefore included a control task 52 to be able to delineate imitation and imitation-inhibition from any attentional deficits or deficits in distractor-inhibition (for detailed task description, see Methods).This also allowed us to control for any motor deficits.”
From Enhanced Automatic Action Imitation and Intact Imitation-Inhibition in Schizophrenia (2019) · cites this paper as [52]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 92
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Chartrand TL Jeffers V Forgas JP Williams KD von Hippel W Consequences of automatic goal pursuit and the case of nonconscious mimicry Responding to the social world: implicit and explicit processes in social judgments and decisions 2003 Philadelphia Psychology Press
- LaFrance M (1982) Posture mirroring and rapport. In: Davis M (ed) Interaction rhythms: periodicity in communicative behaviour. Human Sciences Press, New York
- Authors
- Cook, J., & Bird, G.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bird, Geoffrey
- Venue
- Experimental Brain Research
- Published
- 2011-02-19
- Volume
- 211
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 601-612
- ISSN
- 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1106
- PMC
- PMC3102210
- OpenAlex
- W2076480818
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 9.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Keywords
- imitation, social attitudes, prosocial attitudes, social brain development, adolescence, social priming, action observation, finger movement, social cognition
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Attitude, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review