Cited by 92Action Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Social attitudes differentially modulate imitation in adolescents and adults

Open access
Cook, Jennifer, Bird, Geoffrey·2011·Experimental Brain Research

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated a bidirectional relationship between social attitudes and imitation in adults: pro-social attitudes promote imitation, and imitation further increases positive social attitudes. Social attitudes and the social brain are developing throughout the adolescent years. Thus, the aim of this study was to test whether pro-social attitudes promote imitation in an Adolescent Group to the same extent as in an Adult Group. Participants were primed with pro-social or non-social words in a Scrambled Sentence Priming task. They then completed an Imitation task wherein participants were required to perform a lift action with either the index or middle finger, whilst observing either a compatible action (e.g. index finger response and observed index finger lift) or an incompatible action (e.g. index finger response and observed middle finger lift). In an Effector Priming control condition, observed fingers remained stationary but a semi-transparent green mask was added to either the compatible or incompatible finger. The magnitude of the Imitation Effect and Effector Priming Effect was calculated by subtracting reaction times on compatible trials from those on incompatible trials. In the Adult Group, social priming specifically modulated the Imitation Effect: pro-social priming produced a larger Imitation Effect but did not modulate the Effector Priming Effect. In adolescents, however, no effect of social priming was seen on either the Imitation or Effector Priming measures. We consider possible explanations for these results including the immature development of social brain regions and reduced experience of the relationship between social attitudes and imitation in adolescence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00221-011-2584-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A control task was included so that imitation and imitation-inhibition could be distinguished from attentional or distractor-inhibition problems and from motor deficits.

    “We therefore included a control task 52 to be able to delineate imitation and imitation-inhibition from any attentional deficits or deficits in distractor-inhibition (for detailed task description, see Methods).This also allowed us to control for any motor deficits.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 92

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Chartrand TL Jeffers V Forgas JP Williams KD von Hippel W Consequences of automatic goal pursuit and the case of nonconscious mimicry Responding to the social world: implicit and explicit processes in social judgments and decisions 2003 Philadelphia Psychology Press
  2. LaFrance M (1982) Posture mirroring and rapport. In: Davis M (ed) Interaction rhythms: periodicity in communicative behaviour. Human Sciences Press, New York

Authors
Cook, J., & Bird, G.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Bird, Geoffrey
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Published
2011-02-19
Volume
211
Issue
3-4
Pages
601-612
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
OpenAlex
W2076480818
Cited by
92
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
imitation, social attitudes, prosocial attitudes, social brain development, adolescence, social priming, action observation, finger movement, social cognition
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Attitude, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review