Retention properties of wood residues and their potential for soil amelioration
Abstract
The particle size distribution, the nutrient content and the sorption behaviour of six solid wood and ash/charcoal residues collected in three wood-processing companies in Germany and Brazil were investigated in order to elucidate the potential of these residues for the development of new products for soil amelioration. The absorption of N, P, and K by the residues and the leaching of nutrients from impregnated samples were studied in the laboratory at substrate temperatures of 20 and 300°C. The release of elements by the impregnated samples and the sorption behaviour of ash/charcoal incorporated in the soil were also studied in the field on a temperate site (Hamburg, 53°32'N 09°59'E), on a subtropical site (Ivaí, 25°15'S 50°45'W), and on a tropical site (Aripuanã, 10°09'S 59°26'W). Under laboratory conditions the solid wood residues absorbed 2.0-9.1% of the N, 0.1-0.4% of the P, and 1.0-8.5% of the K available in the impregnation solution. At a temperature of 20°C, selected sieve fractions of the ash/charcoal residues absorbed up to twice as much as N and up to 100 times more K than the treated wood residues. The absorption of N, P, and K to the ash/charcoal residues increased significantly at a substrate temperature of 300°C compared to a substrate temperature of 20°C. In absolute numbers, the leaching of N, P, and K from the impregnated ash/charcoal residues was in the range of the release by the impregnated solid wood residues, whilst the relative rate of nutrient leaching was strongly reduced. The field experiments confirmed the results obtained in the laboratory and indicated that ash/charcoal residues are suitable raw materials for the development of new products for soil amelioration, in particular for application under humid climate conditions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mixing charcoal with ashes and impregnating wood residues with nutrients such as N, P, and K could produce slow release K and N fertilizers.
“For example, Dünisch et al. (2007) found that the mixing of charcoal with ashes and impregnating wood residues with nutrients such as N, P, and K could produce slow release K and N fertilizers.”
From A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: Pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security (2019) · cites this paper as Dünisch et al., 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Dünisch, O., Lima, V. C., Seehann, G., Donath, J., Montóia, V. R., & Schwarz, T.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
- Embrapa (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Dünisch, Oliver
- Venue
- Wood Science and Technology
- Published
- 2006-08-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169-189
- ISSN
- 0043-7719 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-5225
- OpenAlex
- W1993855200
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Wood Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- wood waste, soil improvement, nutrient sorption, nutrient leaching, nitrogen retention, phosphorus retention, potassium retention, particle size distribution, substrate temperature, wood processing waste
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review