Cited by 30Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgricultural and Food SciencesThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

Retention properties of wood residues and their potential for soil amelioration

Dünisch, Oliver, Lima, Valmiqui Costa, Seehann, Günther, Donath, Johannes, Montóia, Valdinez Ribeiro, Schwarz, Thomas·2007·Wood Science and Technology

Abstract

The particle size distribution, the nutrient content and the sorption behaviour of six solid wood and ash/charcoal residues collected in three wood-processing companies in Germany and Brazil were investigated in order to elucidate the potential of these residues for the development of new products for soil amelioration. The absorption of N, P, and K by the residues and the leaching of nutrients from impregnated samples were studied in the laboratory at substrate temperatures of 20 and 300°C. The release of elements by the impregnated samples and the sorption behaviour of ash/charcoal incorporated in the soil were also studied in the field on a temperate site (Hamburg, 53°32'N 09°59'E), on a subtropical site (Ivaí, 25°15'S 50°45'W), and on a tropical site (Aripuanã, 10°09'S 59°26'W). Under laboratory conditions the solid wood residues absorbed 2.0-9.1% of the N, 0.1-0.4% of the P, and 1.0-8.5% of the K available in the impregnation solution. At a temperature of 20°C, selected sieve fractions of the ash/charcoal residues absorbed up to twice as much as N and up to 100 times more K than the treated wood residues. The absorption of N, P, and K to the ash/charcoal residues increased significantly at a substrate temperature of 300°C compared to a substrate temperature of 20°C. In absolute numbers, the leaching of N, P, and K from the impregnated ash/charcoal residues was in the range of the release by the impregnated solid wood residues, whilst the relative rate of nutrient leaching was strongly reduced. The field experiments confirmed the results obtained in the laboratory and indicated that ash/charcoal residues are suitable raw materials for the development of new products for soil amelioration, in particular for application under humid climate conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00226-006-0098-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 30

Authors
Dünisch, O., Lima, V. C., Seehann, G., Donath, J., Montóia, V. R., & Schwarz, T.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
  • Embrapa (BR)
Corresponding author
Dünisch, Oliver
Venue
Wood Science and Technology
Published
2006-08-01
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
169-189
ISSN
  • 0043-7719 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-5225
OpenAlex
W1993855200
Cited by
30
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wood Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords
wood waste, soil improvement, nutrient sorption, nutrient leaching, nitrogen retention, phosphorus retention, potassium retention, particle size distribution, substrate temperature, wood processing waste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review