Creep properties of compression wood fibers
Abstract
To achieve efficient utilization of compression wood (CW), a deeper insight into the creep behavior of CW is necessary. In particular, the involvement of lignin for the creep behavior of CW needs to be better understood. In the present paper, wood fibers and slices from CW and normal wood were studied at both high constant humidity and cyclic 30–80% RH conditions. The micromechanical deformation explored by FTIR confirmed that in CW, lignin participated in the stress transfer during creep measurements. For all types of materials, the creep strain rate at constant and cyclic humidity conditions was linearly related to the applied load level. For single CW fibers, the creep rates were higher at a given load for native CW fibers compared to holocellulose CW fibers, due to the lower relative cellulose content. The CW fibers, with a microfibril angle of around 45°, were found to exhibit a greater creep rate during moisture cycling as compared to the higher but constant humidity level, i.e., a mechano-sorptive behavior. However, the mechano-sorptive effect, i.e., the ratio between the creep rates at constant and cyclic humidity, was only slightly higher for the CW holocellulose fibers as compared to the native CW fibers, indicating that the lignin most probably does not contribute to the mechano-sorptive effect.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Repeated wetting-drying cycles and long-term loads can lead to microcracks, particularly at cell wall corners and in the middle lamella region, creating stress concentration and reducing energy absorption and stress redistribution capacity.
“Repeated wetting-drying cycles and long-term loads can lead to microcracks, particularly at cell wall corners and in the middle lamella region; these discontinuities can create stress concentration, thereby reducing the material's energy absorption and stress redistribution capacity (Luimes et al. 2018;García-Iruela et al. 2020;Peng et al. 2020;Mi et al. 2023).”
From Preliminary structural reuse assessment of reclaimed Juniperus excelsa Timber after approximately 42 years of service: Mechanical response, visible defects, and SEM observations (2026) · cites this paper as Peng et al. 2020
Cited by
- Authors
- Peng, H., Salmén, L., Jiang, J., & Lu, J.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing Forestry University (CN)
- RISE Research Institutes of Sweden (SE)
- Chinese Academy of Forestry (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Salmén, Lennart
- Lu, Jianxiong
- Venue
- Wood Science and Technology
- Published
- 2020-09-12
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1497-1510
- ISSN
- 0043-7719 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-5225
- OpenAlex
- W3086330689
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 1.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wood Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0600202)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
- Keywords
- compression wood, creep behavior, wood fibers, lignin, cyclic humidity, moisture cycling, stress transfer, microfibril angle, creep rate, wood utilization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review