Cited by 27Animal Behavior and ReproductionAvian ecology and behaviorMarine animal studies overview

Changing with the times: little penguins exhibit flexibility in foraging behaviour and low behavioural consistency

Open access
Camprasse, Elodie C. M., Sutton, Grace J., Berlincourt, Maud, Arnould, John P. Y.·2017·Marine Biology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00227-017-3193-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Camprasse, E. C. M., Sutton, G. J., Berlincourt, M., & Arnould, J. P. Y.
Affiliations
Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Camprasse, Elodie C. M.
Venue
Marine Biology
Published
2017-07-26
Volume
164
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 0025-3162 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1793
OpenAlex
W2736870131
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Marine Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment (RM27086)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
little penguin, Eudyptula minor, foraging behavior, behavioral consistency, behavioral plasticity, seabirds, GPS tracking, foraging trips, breeding stage, colony variation, environmental variability, group foraging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review